Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (3532)	1/29/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: DD™	Respond to of 20981

J- They must have changed the story <ggg>. DD

To: Janice Shell who wrote (3532)	1/29/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

It seems that Starr had filed to supercede the Jones Case. He wanted both Jones lawyers and Clinton lawyers to cease deposing "his" witnesses. I think it was interfering with his ability to bootstrap a case against the President, by putting pressure on the President as to what evidence he either did or didn't have. My understanding is that the judge allowed the case to go forward and depositions to continue, but with some restrictions, though exactly what I am uncertain. Jones lawyers have filed an appeal. Starr seems to me to be a little too anxious to make any case he can against Clinrton. This isn't truth seeking, it's a personal agenda - hardly an independent investigation.