Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tharos who wrote (5424)	1/29/1998 9:12:00 PM
From: Maxer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17367

OFF TOPIC: Tharos: Thank you for your well reasoned argument about adultery. However, I tend to take it with the same level of realism Nancy Regan's "just say no" campain. Adultery happens. If you are to condemn every man and woman who has ever committed adultery you will condemn half the population of the United States. Sure, people in high places should not set a bad example, and the whole affair with Ms. Lewinsky and the responses by parties concerned are regretable. But I believe you and the tabloid oriented mainstream press are condemning Clinton before all the facts are in. You are guilty of assuming guilt by past transgressions, not on the current facts. As I have said before, it is very likely that Ms. Lewinsky is lying. But the press is not looking at that because, frankly, it's not such a good story. Look at today's news: The garments were tested and no semen was found. Mr. Starr does not want to accept Lewinsky's most recent statement and the immunity for her seems to be dead. We now find she went to public events hours early so she could be in the front row and see Clinton. It could be Starr is in trouble. Lewinsky is accused of lying and blackmail by a previous lover, her high school teacher. Look at the facts. Is this want you want to base your judgments on? I think you are more reasonable than that.