Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: skinowski who wrote (731965)	11/12/2020 9:29:37 AM
From: Bill	10 Recommendations Recommended By AJ Muckenfus Alan Smithee burlegoat Condo D. Long and 5 more members Respond to of 793864

The official lefty refrain is “there is no evidence of widespread election fraud” --- so when you point out an example of fraud, they can claim it is not widespread enough to matter. Of course, they are wrong on two levels. 1. There is evidence. 2. Fraud doesn't have to be widespread to matter. Fraud in just a single city could change a whole state's electoral votes.

To: skinowski who wrote (731965)	11/12/2020 10:24:08 AM
From: DewDiligence_on_SI	17 Recommendations Recommended By AJ Muckenfus Alan Smithee Ben Smith Bill burlegoat and 12 more members Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793864

These kinds of assertions have a basic logic flaw, i.e.: Lack of evidence of fraud is not evidence of the lack of fraud.