Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Coronavirus - Covid 19 Information Sharing Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: B.K.Myers who wrote (876)	11/12/2020 6:44:43 PM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By isopatch Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5960

Your most welcome. I started coming across the GlobalRearch site in the early 2000's when I was studying the very powerful (at the time) Lyndon LaRouche organization and network. I think there is some common historical connection between the LaRouche organization and GlobalResearch. LaRouche intrigued me because he was rabid anti British and I accidentally came across his views while looking at a printed agricultural calendar in the middle of nowhere when I lived in the USA. No internet back then. Since then I have mollified my view as I have learnt more of history from the American perspective. Regarding the GlobalResearch site. globalresearch.ca "In an era of media disinformation, our focus has essentially been to center on the “unspoken truth”. I don't have much appreciation for "fact checking" sites. The implication is their view means approved sites and publications are the only true news reports. Forgive me but I find some of the "fact checker" assertions truly laughable. I like alternate views, and counter arguments. The very notion that we should read only some publications "as the truth" is naive. They all have pluses and minuses depending on the subject matter at hand. Even GlobalResearch can come up with some really good stuff if the established news sources wont touch it for self interest reasons. I understand why a favoured USA news publication might not want to go upsetting powerful political figures. We need the alt news guys to carry the torch of truth in some circumstances, and of course they welcome the business. They need readers too. e.g. https://www.globalresearch.ca/un-syrian-chemical-weapons-report-exposes-washingtons-lies/5361671 https://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-should-pardon-snowden-assange/5729257 https://www.globalresearch.ca/monsanto-roundup-the-impacts-of-glyphosate-herbicide-on-human-health-pathways-to-modern-diseases/5342520 Just imagine, crossing swords with Monsantos RoundUp publicity department eh? ... I am beginning to see why they get classed as an unworthy news source now. Of course peoples views on these matters vary, but I would die of insanity if I just read the UK's BBC. They publish the biggest piles of twaddle at times. So lets see how they rate.... https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/bbc-news-live-tv/ Hmmm. Occasionally they get it right -g- Some of their reports are really famous. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e-CxHOf424 FWIW, the then NY mayor Giuliani has much to explain about that day too, as James Corbett points out. and Dr Russel Baylock, how has he upset the Rockefeller doctrine of modern medicine and health? en.wikipedia.org Frankly, after reading his critical wikipedia profile, I would prefer him as a doctor to many others. The cry of "fake news" does not make much of an impression here.

To: B.K.Myers who wrote (876)	11/12/2020 11:29:44 PM
From: isopatch	2 Recommendations Recommended By maceng2 Winfastorlose Respond to of 5960

You've got to be joking! A hard left, anti-Trump, hate mongering/tolling site, straight up! Almost every widely accepted conservative media outlet, website, or notable conservative is dissed or smeared. Total nonsense! Iso

To: B.K.Myers who wrote (876)	11/12/2020 11:44:22 PM
From: Winfastorlose	3 Recommendations Recommended By isopatch maceng2 Paul Smith Respond to of 5960

Use good judgement and do your own fact checking. I never need to ask some anonymous scam artist whether or not a site is credible. I can read an article myself and know the answer. And by the way, just because someone has an opinion other than the one you or I might have does not necessarily make them wrong. I personally would not want to live in a world here there was only one arbiter of truth

To: B.K.Myers who wrote (876)	4/24/2024 12:59:41 PM
From: maceng2	Respond to of 5960

and the National Library of Medicine? are they rated as "conspiracy - pseudoscience" too? National Library of Medicine (NLM) \| National Institutes of Health (NIH) This is from the 2022 & 2023 time period. by Russell L Blaylock Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth? Covid-19 pandemic: What is the truth? - PubMed (nih.gov) Responses to comments on my paper: “COVID Update: What is the truth? Responses to comments on my paper: “COVID Update: What is the truth?” - PMC (nih.gov) Ignored dangers of the COVID-19 injections Ignored dangers of the COVID-19 injections - PMC (nih.gov)