Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Russell who wrote (27453)	1/30/1998 3:08:00 PM
From: TREND1	Respond to of 53903

RR For what it is worth, here is my look at FA (1) J-CURVE is alive and well ! (2) Korea had it's day in selling dram cheap using current equipment. (3) Korea will NOT get the money to stay in the dram race (4) Korea is history ! (5) The Dram Cycle Lives (6) And finally, no body can figure this all out from an FA point of view so MU will not trade like a Utility (g) Larry Dudash

To: Richard Russell who wrote (27453)	1/30/1998 3:12:00 PM
From: TREND1	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 53903

RR List of current Micron bears: Larry Dudash DaividG RR Skeeter Earlie Kerry Kat Kurlak Micron CEO(g) Larry Dudash

To: Richard Russell who wrote (27453)	1/30/1998 4:38:00 PM
From: Megs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

I think it would be a mistake for the US to participate. Although there would still be 32B going to Korea. Would ANY US company get this deal? No. Let the Koreans LEARN how to properly fund businesses. Capitalism not Socialism. Ooo! A little conservitive there! Was listening to Rush while going to lunch (Rush is illegal in the Seattle area) So keep it among yourselves ;-)

To: Richard Russell who wrote (27453)	1/30/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: Mike M2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

Richard, it is funny how events in SEA were downplayed by the street and now their buddies AG & RR say the bailout is important. I called my representative and said i was opposed to bailing out the banks bad loans in SEA. On the other hand if it would finish off MU I might be inclined to support IMF bailouts-g- I would urge all to let your rep know how you feel. The fed engineered low interest rates bailed the banks out of their real estate mess at the expense of the saver. who will bail out the saver who now has their money in the stock market bubble. The banks should feel the full consequences of their actions FOR ONCE. Conservative bankers of the 30's did not like the idea of deposit insurance because it might encourage reckless banking well IMF bailouts do the same. Mike