Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1280172)	11/23/2020 6:18:01 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Respond to of 1578133

Wharfie, The easiest way is to require it for non-emergent medical care, and I should have added that the ER will vaccinate them. That's still the wrong way to go. Let the health care providers set whatever vaccination requirements that they want from their patients. Besides, even if there is a large portion of people who refuse to take the vaccines, that's OK. Let's say 50% of Californians get the vaccine. The other 50% decides to takes their chances. Eventually a good portion of the antivaxxers will catch the coronavirus and either die or build up an immunity. Either way, we'll eventually get to the 70% "herd immunity" level, and the state COVID-19 numbers will finally trickle down to double-digits. (Of course, I wouldn't be saying this for a more lethal virus like Ebola, or something that can cause considerable harm to children like the measels.) Tenchusatsu