Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bruce Morgan who wrote (1676)	1/30/1998 7:31:00 PM
From: Cheeky Kid	Respond to of 5164

Doesn't make sense to this kid, Sungold does not trade on the Canadian market.....anymore. I don't know if the BCSC would still be invloved if we are on the USA-OTC. Any other out there with some imput?

To: Bruce Morgan who wrote (1676)	1/30/1998 7:50:00 PM
From: John Lawrence	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5164

Sungold delisted from the VSE I agree with CheekyKid. The notice that Bruce posted is irrelevant. Sungold has submitted it's quarterly and annual statement to Nasdaq - as was required for listing. All shareholders should also have in their possesion now the Information Circular sent out in advance of the AGM Feb. 19. This includes the audited quarterly and annual statements. Sungold did not file with the BCSC because, thank God, it is no longer listed on the VSE.

To: Bruce Morgan who wrote (1676)	2/1/1998 12:47:00 PM
From: John Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5164

BCSC has admitted an "electronic error". Annual report has been filed. The BC Securities Commission has admitted that a so-called 'electronic error' was made when the delinquent filer notice was issued. In fact, the quarterly, and annual reports have been filed on time with the BCSC. Anyone who calls the BCSC now will be told that Sungold's reports have been properly filed on time. Apparently the BCSC has said that it is policy to issue these notices without first contacting the company. If they had contacted the company they would have found that an error had been made. I find it very strange that such an accidental error could be made. It reminds me of the 'electronic errors' that the VSE admitted to in their reports on the number of shorts. Looks like the bully boys are back again.