Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (3780)	1/31/1998 1:50:00 AM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Respond to of 20981

PREZ IN ECONOMY TALKS, BOOM OR BUST, SEEMS UNCLEAR ON THE CONCEPTS

To: greenspirit who wrote (3780)	1/31/1998 1:55:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Yup. And glad you brought it up. He had three of the best economists on and they confirm what I had said so many posts ago. Rukeyser: Is Clinton responsible for today's economy?(not verbatim) Ecomonist Hyman: Good grade, but "It's the deck of cards handed him." Meaning: he walked into it. Economist Yardeni: Not so good grade. Go back to Carter with deregulation. Reagan. Especially Reagan. Freed the economy. OK, Clinton works well with Greenspan. But BUSH WAS A BIG NEGATIVE. Economist Kudlow: Clinton: who cares? It's Reagan. Reagan. DID I SAY REAGAN!!!?? Even lesser grade for Clinton. Capital gains cut good. Plan to takeover healthcare was a major negative. Last "State of the Union" a $50 billion mess, but Congress will stop all of it. Good - Works with Greenspan. BUSH A BIG, HUGE NEGATIVE!!!. (meaning: 1990 budget deal HUGE mistake - cost him everything for absolutely no economic gain, just a slowed economy). Thank you Ron!. Saturday night Barbara Wa Wa will profile Reagan "today". PBS will have a documentary on the most important post WWII president in February.