SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (166093)12/17/2020 12:34:37 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217657
 
You are correct, that the trend, if true would be disturbing.

However, WSJ is doing the WSJ thing, and it is making up or otherwise twisting stories, so not to worry.

WSJ mistaken or deliberated set certain actions as command economy, and other tales as policy. It is wrong on both count.

But then again it has been wrong on China China China for far too long, set in WSJ-ways. Safe to ignore, and as safe to ignore as the too often and regularly featured ‘China banking problem’, especially as the problem going fully digital and be more efficient at doing what it is supposed to do, a utility provider, as opposed to being viewed through any lens familiar to WSJ.

The private sector in China are resilient because it is resilient, born into a storm and only the resilient survive.

Please do shout as and when there be any particular question arise and I shall detail as viewed from where I sit.



To: carranza2 who wrote (166093)12/29/2020 2:03:52 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217657
 
Re <<disturbing trend>>

As noted on first response, WSJ was being WSJ Message 33096992

Suspect Bloomberg’s read is closer to truth, that the actions involving Jack Ma was more about stability / reform / growth than to do with anything else

bloomberg.com

Ant Considers Holding Company With Regulation Similar to Bank, Sources Say

updated an hour ago
Financial units face stricter regulation in planned structure

Jack Ma’s under-siege Ant Group Co. is planning to fold its financial operations into a holding company that could be regulated more like a bank, according to people familiar with the situation, potentially crippling the growth of its most-profitable units.

The fintech giant is planning to move any unit that would require a financial license into the holding company, pending regulatory approval, said the people, who asked not be named because the matter is private. The plans are still under discussion and subject to change, the people said. Ant declined to comment.

The operations that Ant is looking to fold into the holding company include wealth management services, consumer lending, insurance, payments and MYbank, an online lender in which Ant is the largest shareholder, the people said. Under the financial holding company structure, Ant’s businesses would likely be subject to more capital restrictions, potentially curbing its ability to lend more and expand at the pace of the last few years.

That said, the proposals suggests Ant would still be able operate in financial services beyond its payments business, quelling investor concern about how to interpret the central bank’s Sunday message when it asked Ant to return to its roots as a payments provider.

“This means China is still trying to encourage domestic consumption, and they need platforms like Ant to help with consumer loans,” said Wang Zhen, a Shanghai-based analyst with UOB-Kay Hian Holdings Ltd. “The key is that consumer lending shouldn’t be over-leveraged.”

SoftBank Group Corp. rose as much as 4.5% in Tokyo trading on Tuesday. The Japanese company is the largest shareholder in Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., a major backer of Ant.

Chinese regulators also told Ant to devise a plan to overhaul its business, the latest in a series of steps to rein in Ma’s online finance empire. While it stopped short of directly asking for a breakup of the company, the central bank stressed Ant needed to “understand the necessity of overhauling its business” and come up with a timetable as soon as possible.

“Its growth would slow a lot,” said Francis Chan, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst in Hong Kong. The valuation of the non-payment businesses, including wealth management and consumer lending, could be slashed by as much as 75%, he said.

Ant was last month poised for a public listing that would have valued it at more than $300 billion, before regulators intervened and scuttled the IPO.

To read more about China’s crackdown on Jack Ma’s empire:
Jack Ma Goes Quiet After Ant Group’s Spectacular Undoing
China Fines Alibaba, Tencent Unit Under Anti-Monopoly Laws
Ant Turning From Windfall to Nightmare for Global Investors
China Tells Ant to Return to Its Payment Roots, Places Curbs
Alibaba Antitrust Fears Worsen China’s Internet Selloff

Ant held $11 billion in cash and equivalents as of June, according to its IPO filing. The company said in its prospectus in October that it would use its subsidiary Zhejiang Finance Credit Network Technology Co. to apply for the financial holding license.

Under rules that took effect in November, non-financial companies which control at least two cross-sector financial institutions are required to hold a financial holding license. Rules on how financial holding companies could be regulated are still under deliberation.

Key Changes Under Draft RulesImpact on Firms
Online lending companies like Ant would be required to provide 30%of funding for loansMore capital needed; Ant holds about 2% of loans on its books
Firms to be banned from operating outside provincial bases without special approval from the banking watchdog. Permission, if granted, to be renewed every three yearsRequire some firms to reapply for licenses; more frequent scrutiny
Those lending in multiple provinces to have a 5 billion yuan of minimum registered capitalMore capital, greater scrutiny on operations
A shareholder cannot control more than one micro-lender operating nationallyLimits expansion vehicles

Chan estimates that Ant needs to inject at least 70 billion yuan ($11 billion) of new capital just for its credit-lending business. That calculation is based on draft rules that require Ant to co-fund 30% of loans, with a maximum asset leverage of five times.

Lifestyle UnitsAnt is planning to leave its digital lifestyle business -- the services that link users with food deliveries, on-demand neighborhood services and hotel bookings -- out of the financial holding company, one of the people said. Ant will still be the parent of all those operations, the person added.

Ant isn’t working on a proposal to break up the company at this time, though is seeking more guidance from regulators on what structure will be acceptable and may change its plans based on that feedback, that person said.

Recent Rule Changes
Businesses straddling two financial sectors, meeting asset threshold classified ‘ financial holding companies’ with greater scrutiny on capital, funding, ownership, etc.
Use of asset-backed securities to fund consumer loans capped at four times net asset value; loans using funding from banks and shareholders shouldn’t exceed firms’ net asset value
Regulators said to cap interest rates charged on consumer loans

Ant’s valuation could fall to below $153 billion, according to Chan, similar to where it stood two years ago after a fundraising round.

— With assistance by Lulu Yilun Chen, Zheng Li, and Jun Luo

(Updates with SoftBank share price, analyst voice)