Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rich_1 who wrote (39504)	1/31/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Rich, you took the words, out of my mouth. vvvvvvvery well said. GO RMIL. hold tight we have lots of hope. joey

To: Rich_1 who wrote (39504)	1/31/1998 3:30:00 PM
From: Ditchdigger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

<Many of us bought this stock because of Gary and his drive to kill the Shorts > Pity, the only thing so far thats dead, is the liquidity of the stock..DD

To: Rich_1 who wrote (39504)	1/31/1998 6:56:00 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

>>Every post we see by them just confirms to all shareholders that these Shorters are in some deep trouble.<< Rich_1, If your only proof that a short squeeze exists is because some who post here have doubts about the viability of this company and the reality of a squeeze sufficient in size to cause any significant increase in the price of the share, then I think you have real problems and will learn an expensive leason. TC

To: Rich_1 who wrote (39504)	1/31/1998 9:28:00 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Respond to of 55532

Pugs, isn't it reassuring that those here affiliated with the big time Shorters will continue posting all weekend long instead of getting on with their lives. You keep saying this. Two questions: 1. Who here is affiliated with shorters? 2. I type quickly enough that it takes very little of my overall time to post here. That aside, why do you think it's such a positive indicator for the company when folks post negative opinions about the company? Every post we see by them just confirms to all shareholders that these Shorters are in some deep trouble. Interesting that you'd make such an observation. I would expect that most people might think it's the other way around when people who have been right far more often than not (Kugler and Tonto, for just two examples) say negative things about a company. Oh, I forgot. They happen to disagree with your agenda, so they must be wrong and they must be short the stock. Everyone I speak to at work who knows what these non-shareholders have attempted to do to us and our investment over the last 4-5 months totally agree that a huge short position here is obvious. Funny. Everyone I speak to about this company, the cartel, and the nature of the posts, seem to think it's a scam. Does that make it true? No more than your telling your co-workers your opinions makes a short position "obvious". Let them keep guessing and try to pry information from all of us. They will criticize to all extreme in order to get us to challenge them, thus providing them with information. You have information to which only you and the cartel are privvy? More power to you if you do. Personally, I find it hard to believe that anyone within the cartel could possibly have more solid information than some of the "nays" who've done their own digging. When your esteemed, all-seeing leader labels as "bogus", information that is easily proven correct, what is one to think of his ability to dig up information that is considerably more difficult, especially from a company who, themselves, can't be trusted to provide true information. Once again, if they have no affiliation with the shorts which we highly doubt, then what's it to them what those plans are. Personally, I don't care what your big ol' hush-hush secret plans are. The mystique they add to the proceedings don't faze this Missourian a bit. Am I affiliated with "the shorts"? I would not at all be surprised if the money is in their accounts, and they are now using the funds to line up a serious of releases to blow the shorts out of the water. They will not not even want to reveal these plans to shareholders for fear of a leak onto the internet which in essense, is like conveying their plans ahead of time dirrectly to the Shorters themselves. Sounds extremely far-fetched, but what hasn't? This same thing happenned with IOMG... It's just a matter of time before RMIL is added to that distinguished list Ummmm.... RMIL is definitely no IOM, Rich. I don't know about the other two companies, but am reasonably certain IOM had a lot more going for it from a fundamental standpoint than RMIL does or ever will.