Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (3889)	1/31/1998 3:53:00 PM
From: Sawdusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

"I guess you didn't know that Starr is a judge. Or did you?" In fact I did. Just personally think that it should be earned rather than given. In this situation I believe it to be a stretch of the English language. One must live up to ones titles don't you think? Regards, Dan

To: Hippieslayer who wrote (3889)	1/31/1998 4:07:00 PM
From: Sawdusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Further thoughts. Starr announced his "retirement" from Whitewater issues last year until pressure was applied from person or persons unknown. After many millions of dollars spent he had failed to achieve his original objectives. His efforts have now been diverted well beyond the scope originaly mapped. It is now not an issue of whether or not Clinton was deeply involved in Whitewater but rather "get Clinton" at any cost, for any reason. Somehow this has all become entangled with the Paula Jones issue. Why in your opinion would Paula's attourneys reject the proposal to fast track the case rather than wait until May? Is it just remotely possible that there is an agenda to keep this in front of the public as long as possible? Is there any coincidence that this is also a Congressional election year? Interested in your thoughts, Dan