SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Henry Niman who wrote (14026)2/1/1998 6:48:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Actually, It looks like tomorrow's Barron's has three articles:

Headline
Date

There Are Some Things You Just
Can't Bank On Any More
Feb. 2

Takeover Titillation
Feb. 2

Clinton's Apparent Recovery Buoys
the Stock Market
Feb. 2

suggesting talks between AHP and PNU. In "Takeover Titillation", the unusually high activity on PNU's March 40 calls is cited. Speculation on PNU is also cited in the "Can't Bank On" article, and specifics are given in the Clinton article (AHP has a history of buying medium sized companies, i.e. American Cyanimid, and Fred Hassan was #3 at AHP and now heads PNU. He could be the new CEO or heir-apparent to Stafford.
Of course the AHP executive (Nigro-Vilar) who ran AHP's Premarin program (their #1 product), is CSO of LGND and extremely interested in SERMs (LGND has programs with AHP (osteoporosis), PFE (osteoporosis), LLY (cancer), and plans on a major move into Alzheimer's.



To: Henry Niman who wrote (14026)2/1/1998 8:46:00 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 32384
 
Thanks for the analysis.



To: Henry Niman who wrote (14026)2/1/1998 1:12:00 PM
From: John O'Neill  Read Replies (10) | Respond to of 32384
 
Henry N.,

It looks like the pending mergers will provide more R & D $$..

How do you think these big companies, in general, view doing R&D thru biotechs such as Ligand. Do some large companies prefer to do their own research rather than partnering? Is it the patents that small biotechs have that are the driving force? Or is just better for the giant drug firms to partner with indepndent companies who are researching specific areas/drugs.

John