SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: paul centis who wrote (534)2/1/1998 6:19:00 PM
From: George J. Tromp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2251
 
Hello Paul. If I didnt know better., I think you just called me a liar.
Well., I have the drill holes., but unfortunately you will have to do your
own digging for comparisions just the way I have for the last 5 yrs.
you can start going through Winspears post., theyre are several there.
It really would be nice to start comparing MPV with ABER but unfortunately that cant happen til MPV release an indication of gem
quality., early on Aber used to reference stones as clear and colorless., transparents to give the investor a hint. Secondly If one
wants to bite the 50mil ton resource Vandersande is putting out to shareholders., then he should be able to produce some full drill holes.,
in all the drilling to date. How do you know., that the 50mil ton
resource isnt filled half way with country rock., wall rock. or other
undesirables., that can dilute the core., without seeing total drill intercepts as well., continutity of kimberlite.,. Just take his word huh.
Well., look I really dont care if MPV pipes are half filled with buffalo
turds {grin}. I own the stock in the .80C range., so I have nothing
to prove. I just have my suspicions engendered over the last 4 yrs.,
that these boys., dont always tell it like it is. As far as the stone reporting pardon the pun., but it looks like theyre trying to "trump"
Winspear reporting style. Well., I have seen thru the tactics., I am not amused. but I will let them play the little games., who cares.!!!!!!!
. As far as a 5 mil ton resource., I believe Kaiser
the almighty thinks otherwise., based on 100,OO carat. Well tell me someone., how many pink diamonds., or green diamonds would it take to skewer those numbers., please dont get me started here.,
I just changed my sweatshirt from drooling. I am not going to sit here
and speculate., you paid the dollar., so you do the time.., Well, maybe
you would rather believe Kaiser when he says MPV will have pipes
better than Aber. Well, quite frankly I am a little suspicious., Paul.,,
and I will tell you why., those boys at MPV never hesitated to let investors think those stones were worth 35.00 carat for a good couple of years. Bingo DeBeers pops in and they test another????
part of the pipe on 5034 and numbers increase.? especially in a
declining raw diamond market.????? Hell even Aber discounted their stones during Bulk sampling to reflect the trend. So just dont
ask any questions Paul, and dont question management., just accept
everything thats said., you will do just fine. I think it goes without saying Winspear must come up with some tonnage., no one has implied otherwise. But I will let you in on a little clue., Winspear is closer at this point in describing the Dyke stones as FANCIES than
any company in North America. Why because they have done the
PREP work. Whether it is economic remains to be seen., but I can
tell you once again., IMHO when a source is found coupled with the
dykes., it will make economic sense. Especially seeing Aber will be
in production by late 2001 or do you see it as an impossibility that
ore from Winspears property could not be shipped to Diavik to be
processed.? How about it Walt., is this not a possibility.???????
Well I think anything is possible., if the deposit should come in with
marginal tonnage., Aber would probably be most willing to add additonal assetts to diavik. But hey lets not think too far ahead here.
George J. Tromp



To: paul centis who wrote (534)2/3/1998 7:55:00 PM
From: paul centis  Respond to of 2251
 
Interesting performance from MPV and CFV today!