SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Digital Equipment Corp. (DEC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sstockss who wrote (2883)2/1/1998 11:25:00 PM
From: George Dvorsky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3276
 
Sstockss,

It SSure will be tough traSSitioning from DEC to CPQ (in addition to learning to type the symbol).
DEC was viewed as a turn around play, CPQ is a growth play. CPQ has a high P/E that may scare a lot of people but, most of the time, DEC showed no earnings, only their potential.
I don't know how much of my portfolio I'd put into 'in the money' LEAPS for this close. My style would call for buying Jan 00 or Jan 01 40 or 50???? calls. I use a crude spreadsheet to look at the payoff from an anticipated move, and weigh the risk/reward ratio.
Without running the spreadsheet (no time for the next month, I'd like to run it when I sell my April DEC calls) I'd guess less 'gambling' money would lock in the big move that would result if the DEC division finally started contributing $5/share to the bottom line. The growth rate would look staggering and could easily push CPQ/DEC over $50.
On the other hand, short term integration problems could keep your stategy from being worth the risk.
I would seek the advice of William Vu, who I belive was very timely and accurate on his last public reccomendation of DEC LEAPS.
Too quick to spell check,
gd



To: sstockss who wrote (2883)2/3/1998 12:53:00 PM
From: George Dvorsky  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 3276
 
Seems I checked the CPQ board on an informative day. Yesterday there was way too much conversation and not enough serious discussion. There was even some banal taunting. While I am a big Howard Stern fan and do not get offended by bathroom humor, I think it is better left to the professionals (who are truly funny). I think the forum would be more useful if it was not littered by so many inane comments. Then we would not have to wade through the babble to get to the discussion that this was intended for. Private comments are best at the end of a bit of useful information in a p.s. or sent via e-mail.
Any opinions on this? How to or if I should post it on the CQP thread?

gd

p.s. love the spell checker they installed.