SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ggersh who wrote (168920)2/25/2021 5:48:30 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 218805
 
Klaus certainly seems questionable

scientificamerican.com

Do genes make people evil?
—Robert Schreib, Jr., Toms River, N.J.

Daniel Lametti, a neuroscientist at McGill University, responds:

THE MONTREAL apartment where I live is rife with evildoers—well, to be precise, there is at least one. A couple of weeks ago my newspaper, routinely delivered at 5 a.m. to my building’s lobby, disappeared before I could scurry out of bed to collect it. To thwart the criminal, I asked my deliveryman to hurl the paper onto my third-floor balcony (thankfully, he has a good arm).

Admittedly, newspaper theft ranks low on the scale of evil acts. Still, I wouldn’t steal a newspaper. I would like to think that under most circumstances I wouldn’t steal at all. But many people do, and many also commit crimes that are much more sinister.

Scientists would like to know the root causes of evil behavior: Is it a product of our genes or environment? The answer appears to involve a combination of the two.

Since the 1960s psychologists have found that children who were abused and neglected are more likely to commit crimes later in life. Even so, researchers noted that most youngsters who are mistreated do not grow up to be criminals. Now our genes come into the picture.

A 2002 study found that a particular variation of a gene predicted antisocial behavior in men who were mistreated as children. The gene controls whether we produce an enzyme called monoamine oxidase A (MAOA), which at low levels has been linked to aggression in mice. The researchers found that boys who were neglected and who possessed a variation of the gene that produced low levels of MAOA were more likely to develop antisocial personality disorder, commit crimes and grow up to have a violent disposition. But those living in a similar environment who produced more of the enzyme rarely developed these problems.

Psychopaths are arguably the evilest of the evildoers. A study published in August 2010 looked at psychopathic tendencies in teenagers with low socioeconomic resources. The researchers found that adolescents who had a variation of another gene, which contributes to how quickly serotonin is recycled in the brain and which has been linked to hostile behavior in children, were more likely to exhibit signs of psychopathy.

These two recent findings provide strong evidence that evil behavior—mass murder, armed robbery, and perhaps even newspaper theft—might be caused by the right set of genes interacting with the wrong environment.



To: ggersh who wrote (168920)2/25/2021 10:27:49 PM
From: sense1 Recommendation

Recommended By
maceng2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218805
 
The ludicrousness of politics today... as protesters feign opposition to fascism... while demanding more of it... should not escape the awareness of anyone who cares about the proper use of the language... or, you know, the real world impacts of getting it wrong.

Fascism... the origin taken from the fascia binding things together, like muscles... Brittanica: "Benito Mussolini ’s Fascist Party of Italy was named for the fasces, which the members adopted in 1919 as their emblem. The Winged Liberty dime, minted in the United States from 1916 to 1945, depicts the fasces on its reverse side."

It should not be lost on anyone... that the "face of liberty" presented to us in money... is backed by its opposite.

Nor is that aspect of the Janusian cult an issue unique to the thinking of two-faced bankers or politicians of various postured ideological stripes... who if you scratch them... will turn out to have a share in the same bloody backside... as the "globalists" are all "of a feather"... posing differences... but of the same cult and common purpose

The true variation is found in nationalists or populists of varying ideological stripe... who do vary in fact... as truth is, there being ideologues who are true believers, while still not altering any element in the outcome of the play being staged with their participation... it has their belief making them better actors... facilitating our suspension of disbelief.

But, the reality that we're governed by Nazi's now, one and all... in a world of competing Nazi regimes... which you'd think should be noticed... is lost in the misuse and abuse of the language, as the national socialists new crop of shock troops are active again, with only a change in the color or their wardrobe, now posing themselves as the most vociferous in opposing, as Nazi's, all of those who oppose national socialism... and demand individual liberty instead of a forced surrender to the power of the state.

China's CCP... is about as communist now as Hitler was... without there being any language police capable of requiring changing the monikers to keep up... as the focus of systems and management changes its stripes for spots... sustaining only the insistence that, since that's what we require... it is right by definition.

The language has adapted itself in Orwellian ways to avoid the inconvenience of becoming too obvious... so rather than admit to state control of industry, incestuously melded with industry control of politics... still leaving room for a local strong man... with the bankers behind all of it as always... we pretend its all natural in its origin... consensual and cooperative... objections to this "Nazism" being adopted is dismissed by having it simply re-labelled as a wonderful "public-private partnership".

The core element... is that in the misunderstanding of the role of money in the system... There is no real "competition" between capitalism and communism... Capitalism controls our world. But, capitalism, like communism, is an amoral system, that puts material things ahead of everything else... the only quibble between them being... who controls things, in fact. I say it as: "No difference between communists and kings, other than who gets to be king". Capitalists don't care about communism... or free markets... or any ideology... they only care about money... and it being money alone that has the power to make the rules in its own self interest.

"He who has the gold"... has suddenly become relevant again... whether in terms of bitcoin or physical... ? That being an admission made about an error that was embraced, in the limits of power to control... without having some modern magic to mystify, or some ancient talisman (barbarous relic/pet rock) to shake as a symbol of authority ?

In that interest, still, not above structuring a bit of theater to distract the masses from who keeps creating all these problems ? They're happy to foster the illusion of ideological competitions... without them having the potential of changing anything. Note, that is not the same thing as saying nothing ever changes... or that it doesn't matter... only that the more things change the more they stay the same. And that, only with the awareness that volatility and gamma have a relationship... the shifting of things over time being essential to profiting from the options trade... the value not able to be extracted by enabling a trade... and then having the value in the trade lost, or being obviated, by imposing stability within the system.

That interest being real... not a conspiracy theory... isn't an invitation to surrender to it ? The control imposed is real... but the power to impose it is tenuous... dependent both on sustained corruption, and on success in hiding the fact of the corruption... as well as winning its trades, without which corruption fails... in known patterns... and, of course, that necessarily means they have a shared need to avoid those influences being applied against others.

The only real and persistent challenge there has ever been (beyond the internal struggles familiar under monarchy) to the global system of an essentially tribal leadership asserting its span of control as far as it may... whether as kings overtly... or by proxy through vassals, including the expedient of (even unwitting) vassals professing to be communists... or those posing as bankers... is in the idea of free markets. That challenge has had its erstwhile fullest expression, first in the United States, as the true home of its ideological origin (among the indigenous tribes), and its adoption as not only an economic system, but as an ideology and system of government, imbued first with moral belief... and more recently in Hong Kong... at least as full in expression, if not belief.

Free markets are not an economic system... but a moral system, the economic impact of which is seen in enabling freedom in markets... as a consequence of fostering a system based on the virtues of freedom.

The bait and switch applied in the west, today... is to posture capitalism as "the same thing" as free markets... with the deviations from the moral systems enabling our freedoms being labelled as "crony capitalism" in the expectation the excursions will be considered as correctable errors in anomalies... and then still justify the expression of surprise when what the amoral capitalism delivers, in the interest of maximizing its profits, is not freedom, or free markets, but monopoly and control by robber barons, along with ideological conflicts with communists and "national socialists" demanding their freedom back... all of which has been sponsored for purpose...

It's about the gamma. Its about control.