Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (16960)	2/2/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: Alan Buckley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24154

Why would the judge construe that? This is not news. MSFT products assume IE will be there because that's part of the advantage of having it integrated. MSFT has made it painfully clear for over a year that this is and will be the case. The injunction settlement says a Win95 OEM version without the IE icon must be offered. It does not tell MSFT to go change all the assumptions in their code that IE is present.

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (16960)	2/2/1998 6:13:00 PM
From: nommedeguerre	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24154

Bill, >>Norm, That will be construed as contempt of court by the judge. I >>hope it gets drwan to his attention by some method. That will make >>him hit the roof, just hit the roof. The fine will get upped to $5M >> per day. So get it to Judge Jackson(no relation) and start the >>fires burning. I'm just a simple software engineer like Bill G., dazed and confused by the strange ways and neon slipstream of our court system. How would I ever get access to a Federal Judge? Cheers, Norm