Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (197620)	4/1/2021 12:24:29 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 355274

Where did you get that? The autopsy states he had 11 ng/ml The following link documents cases of death at < 3 ng/ml although more commonly higher and sometimes as high as 11 or 13 ng/ml. In any case, quite possibly a lethal dose, certainly when mixed with Meth and his heart disease and other physical issues. Which guarantees there "should" be reasonable doubt as to whether the actions of the officer killed him, given there was no reference in the autopsy to his air supply being cut off. I just think you can't get to a legit murder conviction with his physical health problems + fentanyl. It just has to create reasonable doubt.