Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (197688)	4/1/2021 9:35:21 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 355545

I will continue to see if I can find the previous article; however, I spent quite a bit of time looking and was unable to find it in reviewing the browser history around the time I was looking at this stuff. When I see it again I'll post the link to you. Don't go out of your way on my account. I just questioned your assertion that he had four times the lethal level in his blood. That seemed so excessive as to be unlikely. With that much in his blood he would have been dead before he even made a purchase in the store, one would think. So I was just wondered about the basis for your assertion.

To: i-node who wrote (197688)	4/2/2021 2:27:13 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 355545

Exhibit 4 also records that Dr. Baker “said that if Mr. Floyd had been found dead in his home (or anywhere else) and there were no other contributing factors he would conclude that it was an overdose death.” Correct. The thing is, he wasn't found in his home or some random place with no other indication of death. He is on video, with a cop kneeling on his neck. Which at a minimum, makes it a contributing factor. In the absence of other things, like not being able to find a pulse, but continuing restraint, just to mention one, it should be considered negligent homicide. As it is...