Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (197709)	4/2/2021 3:38:55 PM
From: Brumar89	3 Recommendations Recommended By bentway rdkflorida2 Terry Maloney Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 366014

Actually it is part of the point. I've listened to bits and pieces of the devastating police testimony against Chauvin and I note that experienced police officers are NOT standing by him. What he did wasn't procedure and wasn't necessary. He actually had a duty to provide care to Floyd, not just restrain him. But he provided NO CARE at all and his restraint was harmful to Floyd's survival. As it was clearly intended to be. The idea Floyd died because of his drug use ..... was it just a coincidence that it was during the 9.5 minutes of unnecessary restraint that he died? What was the point of keeping Chauvin's knee on Floyd's neck for almost ten minutes until he stopped complaining of breathing problems and died? Obviously, from my comments here, I did not approve of that action, do not believe it was necessary or sensible in the circumstances, don't "like" that it was done, any of that. But none of that is the point. ...... We now operate under the rule of racists. IOW you realize Chauvin will be convicted and you won't accept it. You'll just keep lying about it.