Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (198260)

4/8/2021 3:58:43 PM

From: Lane3

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 356664

What the autopsy report said was, "cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression," a statement I can hardly make sense of when combined with the claim of "homicide", which is normally interpreted as a death that another person caused (legally or illegally).

I don't think it's inconsistent. Today's witness said that Floyd died of lack of oxygen. He mentioned somewhere in his testimony that that can cause a heart attack. Regardless of which part of Floyd's body ended up failing, it would seem that another party could have caused it. If you are drowned, you suffocate, as in die of lack of oxygen, and it's a homicide.

To: i-node who wrote (198260)	4/8/2021 6:03:30 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356664

The autopsy report called it a homicide. It's either justifiable or not justifiable. I think most people die from their heart stopping so "cardiopulmonary arrest" doesn't mean much.