Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (198359)	4/9/2021 2:43:36 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	2 Recommendations Recommended By bentway Ms. Baby Boomer Respond to of 356479

Insurrectionist, meet defender of Congress, bang. Nodey may have trouble understanding that...

To: Lane3 who wrote (198359)	4/9/2021 3:24:53 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 356479

Well, that's not consistent with any vision of America I ever heard of before Biden stole the election. It was not a police officer's right or responsibility to decide whether this was a protest (it was) versus an insurrection (words that most of the cops could not define if they had to at that moment; besides the people on this thread and in the extreme liberal news media, I don't know of anyone who believes it). It just doesn't meet the definition of an insurrection. If she were breaking in with a weapon, it still doesn't show it was an insurrection. But I don't think lethal force could have been appropriate without evidence of a weapon, or an expressed intent to do harm to a police officer (who where the people that room was full of, I think). This is not even a leftist position you're taking, it is a DEMOCRAT position. No leftist, moderate or Republican would take that position. Only Democrats who are defending not the country, but Joe Biden's theft of the presidency.