SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Vattila who wrote (40873)4/27/2021 11:52:38 AM
From: Pravin KamdarRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 72154
 
As Neo and others pointed out, even if they just meet revenue guidance in Q1, with a 37% YOY growth forcast, the QOQ growth for this year is not so great. Perhaps that is what the marketed focused on after the Q4 earnings call.

Since I expect them to beat for Q1, they have to raise for Q2 and FY2021.

There was a big shortage of Ryzen 5000 in Q1. This is resolving in the first month of Q2. I guess they used their high binning chiplets in Q1 to support EPYC. I suspect they also used a lot of wafer starts to support expansion of laptop. Also, they probably had contractual requirements to support XBOX and PS5. XBOX was strong in Q1 -- PS5, not so much.

If they did get more allocation in Q1, it should be shown in Q2 -- as we see with 5600X, 5800X, available at MSRP, and 5900X coming in-and-out of supply at Amazon. Again, 5950X and GPUs are still MIA.

Yes, the long term is important, but I fear a market crash in the near term. If we are lucky enough to get a further pop tomorrow, I will probably get into a more conservative (wealth preservation) position. In fact, I already have been.



To: Vattila who wrote (40873)5/14/2021 6:18:15 AM
From: VattilaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 72154
 
To make amends, after my C64 digressions derailed the thread, here is my latest update of my scenarios for AMD's longterm prospects. I have added CAGR to the table, since any consideration of market capitalisation, and hence stock price, needs to take growth into account.

AMD+Xilinx longterm prospects (3-5 years) Revenue CAGR GM EPS Market cap. SP Likelihood
Doom-and-gloom: Falters and fades away, overtaken by competitors <$8B <(-10)% <40% <$0 <$40B <$25 1%
Pessimistic: Underdog, fighting for profitability, precarious future $8B–10B (-10)–(-5)% 40–45% $0–1 $40B–80B $25–50 4%
Stable: Respected competitor, solid profitability, competitive pressure $10B–20B (-5)–10% 45–50% $1–4 $80B–160B $50–100 25%
Optimistic: Matches competitors, high margins and solid growth $20B–40B 10–30% 50–55% $4–8 $160B–320B $100–200 45%
Pie-in-the-sky: Overtakes competitors, leading innovation and markets $40B+ 30%+ 55%+ $8+ $320B+ $200+ 25%

My CAGR numbers are estimated roughly to reach the given revenue range from the current level (~$13B AMD+Xilinx) in 4 years. AMD targets 20% CAGR in their latest financial model. Lisa Su was asked about that number after the Xilinx merger announcement, and she confirmed that the combined entity would uphold that target over the long term. AMD is confidently forecasting 50% growth this year, while Zacks forecasts ~14% growth for Xilinx (Xilinx is not giving guidance due to the merger).

EPS and market capitalisation numbers are based on 1.6B shares outstanding after the acquisition of Xilinx. On 2021-05-13, market capitalisation stood at $89B + $28B = $117B for AMD+Xilinx (equivalent to a combined share price of $73). This compares to $340B for Nvidia (2.9x AMD+Xilinx) and $218B for Intel (1.9x AMD+Xilinx).

AMD's revenue was $6.5B for 2018, $6.7B for 2019 and $9.8B for 2020, with $14.6B forecasted for 2021, on track for a CAGR of 31% over 3 years. Xilinx's revenue was $3.1B for FY2019, $3.2B for FY2020 and $3.1B for FY2021, achieving a CAGR of 0% over 2 years. Nvidia's revenue was $11.7B for FY2019, $10.9B for FY2020 and $16.7B for FY2021, achieving a CAGR of 19% over 2 years. Intel's revenue was $70.8B for 2018, $72.0B for 2019 and $77.9B for 2020, achieving a CAGR of 5% over 2 years.

AMD's gross margin was 37% for 2018, 43% for 2019, and 45% for 2020, with their latest financial outlook targeting ~47% for 2021. Xilinx's gross margin was 69% for FY2019, 67% for FY2020, and 68% for FY2021. Nvidia's gross margin was 62% for FY2019, 62% for FY2020, and 62% for FY2021. Intel's gross margin was 62% for 2018, 58% for 2019, and 56% for 2020, with further decline expected for 2021.

AMD's net profit margin was 5% for 2018, 4% for 2019, and 26% for 2020, with 20% forecasted for 2021. Xilinx's net profit margin was 29% for FY2019, 25% for FY2020, and 21% for FY2021. Nvidia's net profit margin was 35% for FY2019, 26% for FY2020, and 26% for FY2021. Intel's net profit margin was 30% for 2018, 29% for 2019, and 27% for 2020, with further decline expected for 2021.

Sources:

Yahoo Finance | AMD | Key Statistics
Yahoo Finance | Xilinx | Key Statistics
Yahoo Finance | Nvidia | Key Statistics
Yahoo Finance | Intel | Key Statistics
Macrotrends | AMD
Macrotrends | Xilinx
Macrotrends | Nvidia
Macrotrends | Intel

Comparison charts:

Mactrotrends | Revenue (INTC, AMD, NVDA, XLNX)
Mactrotrends | Gross Margin (INTC, AMD, NVDA, XLNX)
Mactrotrends | EPS (INTC, AMD, NVDA, XLNX)