Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (4425)	2/3/1998 6:15:00 PM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

Janice, whenever this administration has something which readily proves other people's accusations wrong. They come forth with it right away. Whenever they don't. They stonewall. The pattern is all too clear to anyone objectively looking at this. The perjury sign is hanging all to close to this administration. The truth will come out. They can only stonewall for so long. Michael

To: Janice Shell who wrote (4425)	2/3/1998 6:36:00 PM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

<<And it seems perfectly reasonable to me that there may be many (non-sexual and non-partisan) reasons why they should not be made public.>> Ummmm...like what? G. W.

To: Janice Shell who wrote (4425)	2/3/1998 8:01:00 PM
From: halfscot	Respond to of 20981

Starr isn't asking merely for information about Monica's visits; he wants to see the White House logs. And it seems perfectly reasonable to me that there may be many (non-sexual and non-partisan) reasons why they should not be made public. I know you must have felt the same when it was revealed that over 900 confidential FBI files on Republicans were taken to the White House where just about anyone there had access to them. These were much more revealing than the logs and can potentially cause much more harm. Remember too, again, the stonewalling and how Clinton at first said that it was an inconsequential matter, a mistake, that only a few files were taken, etc., etc. Regards, halfscot