Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: w0z who wrote (11483)	6/22/2021 1:57:00 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26764

The whole thesis sets off a red flag. I respect much of what you write but this seems to have escaped your radar: Prior to the study’s disclosure, the public was led to believe by regulators and vaccine developers that the spike protein produced by mRNA COVID vaccines stayed in the shoulder where it was injected and was not biologically active — even though regulators around the world had a copy of the study which showed otherwise. Who actually believed these would stay in the shoulder? I see that as a FALSE statement. I haven't heard anyone question it was "not biologically active" so that bit about not staying at the injection site seems a red herring to have something to argue against. I'm an engineer and self taught investor but I can follow biology well enough to know you inject things into muscles so they spread SLOWLY compared to injecting directly into the blood stream. If you expected it to stay at the injection site, you would call it an "implant." So... I don't waste time looking at arguments that rely on a false premise. That method is COMMON for scammers... I think they call it a "straw man argument."