Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (173875)	6/28/2021 8:40:27 PM
From: David	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217619

Re <<But, if China... really the CCP... can't admit to any wrong, or SHARED concern... despite the obvious... divorce will be the only answer... >> besides the German government (and not the political parties) admitting wrong, I do not recall any political party admitting any wrong at any time as a matter of habit. As I do not know, and so I highlight hedge words. You will need to have someone else approve that as I am not in a position to see what was sold.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (173875)	6/28/2021 9:33:06 PM
From: sense	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217619

Addressing shared interest in solving problems... is more important than obsessing over details... If hypersensitive about admitting that problems exist to be solved... ? Then, you have to move on along that line... to synch perception with the proper reductionist/holistic locus in best seeing the origin of THAT problem... And, that means ending in "can't get there from here"... in the context we're considering... So, I think there are obvious paths to take that do enable avoiding conflict... And I think those paths will not be taken, but will avoided...