Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: roto who wrote (175008)	7/17/2021 7:24:16 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By marcher Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217815

<<based on the criteria of the World Bank and the United Nations>> ... presumably means that China did not have anything to do with making the rules, for China was late comer in those august rule-making organisations led by like-minded rule-makers per rule-by-making-up-rules Team USA. Would this be a fair synopsis of how we got to this point? Irrespective of how we got here, is it a mathematical fact that each American pollutes more than every Chinese? Assuming for a moment that MQ is wrong about CO2. If yes, and yes, is it also true that Team China, by production of solar everything in Xinjiang, is doing much for planetary cleanup, and Team USA is trying most to hiccup the process of solarisation of electricity? If yes, yes, and yes, what should happen now? Presumably either Team USA stop being a hindrance to development or step up to the plate, logic dictates How can USA do either given its governance system, begs the question. I do not have PC answers acceptable to controlled MSM and social networks, and in any case a straight answer requires use of much complicated construction involving use of 'but' and 'however'. In the meantime, rainy Sunday morning, and it is video time :0))) Searched on ' china environmental protection climate protection' and went down the various rabbit holes all CCP propaganda but through our lying eyes, that some might interpret as hyper nationalistic only because a nation is doing it and not milling time, using stolen technology or not, but using, per imperatives lead to solutions, do do do China is NOT an advanced DEVELOPED domain because girls do not get to choose to be boys under operation of law, and fellows cannot compete against fellowettes in sports and in jail If China is a DEVELOPED domain, to which ruling party do we attribute the state of development, and there we run into an inconvenient problem to the likes of CNN, and such suspect MSM are not yet ready to give up the fight. Problems problems problems, whenever folks decide to walk path of untruth, in that untruths clash with other untruth.