SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sense who wrote (177430)8/29/2021 5:26:35 AM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217574
 
Looks like a grand new thread you have put together. Thanks. Bookmarked.

On a different but related theme is the documentary I mentioned earlier.

No need to go into the intricacies of Afghanistan.

Are Petrodollars responsible for big international banks becoming "super national" i.e, not reporting to any government. Thus creating a world wide slavery system with Wahhabistic overtones, and full of graft and corruption ? That graft and corruption spreading back into National governments, world wide.

It might explain a lot of things.

I notice over the years, UK Members of Parliament (MP's) make statements in the house like "it's above my pay grade" etc. From my perspective that is bollocks; They are voted in and the are supposed to represent the voters. May not be reality, but that is how they are supposed to act, and what they get paid for.

The drug trade would be another example I suppose, both illegal drugs, and now the experimental drugs trade.

This link put's us "on topic" as it were. Straight back to gold and crypto.

"and not one of fortune or happenstance, but a political one, done in exchange for protection and weapons, and one that sparked countless additional network effects that over time solidified the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. "

The Hidden Costs Of The Petrodollar - Bitcoin Magazine: Bitcoin News, Articles, Charts, and Guides

and

"III. AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND THE PETRODOLLAR
In October 2000, Saddam Hussein did attempt to alter the petrodollar system when he announced that Iraq would sell oil in euros, not dollars. By February 2003, he had sold 3.3 billion barrels of oil for 26 billion euros. With his French and German trading partners, the “petroeuro” was born, which if expanded would help a euro market develop against lots of other currencies, boosting the euro’s strength and eroding the dollar’s exorbitant privilege. But one month later, the U.S., aided by the United Kingdom, invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam. By June, Iraq was back to selling oil in dollars again
.

Did America go to war to defend the petrodollar? This possibility is almost never discussed in retrospective analyses of the war, which tend to fixate on questions of Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction stockpile, human rights abuses or terror links. "


Sounds consistent to me. I always wondered what Tony Blair was babbling about. It was simply about money... wealth... and money does of course talk.



To: sense who wrote (177430)8/29/2021 5:58:20 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
maceng2

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217574
 
<<gold>>

Inflation, described as transient, might be somewhat transient, or might otherwise be described as comedic. This kind of ‘inflation’ is not amenable to vaxxing by gold.

OTOH, any monetary / fiscal ‘fix’ of supply chain would be gold-friendly, and once supply chains smoothed out and the extra-safety supply-chain go belly up, more monetary / fiscal fixes would be necessary, and again gold-friendly.

bloomberg.com

One Stuck Box of Fertilizer Shows the Global Supply Chain Crisis

Ann Koh
Supply Lines is a daily newsletter that tracks trade and supply chains disrupted by the pandemic. Sign up here.

Somewhere in the world’s busiest port of Shanghai, a container of fertilizer sits among tens of thousands of boxes, waiting for a ride to the U.S. It’s been on the dock for months, trapped by typhoons and Covid outbreaks that have worsened major congestion in the global supply-chain network.

While the fertilizer has been stranded there since May, the port is just one stop on the long journey from central China to the U.S. Midwest. Delays have stretched a delivery that ordinarily would take weeks to more than half a year. And that time frame will keep expanding, as the goods have barely started the roughly 15,000 kilometer (9,300 mile) trek.

This is the tale of one humble shipment and its arduous journey across the world. While some of the barriers keeping it from its final destination may be specific to this particular case, the journey is emblematic of the inertia that has gripped global trade during the pandemic.

From the U.S. to Sudan to China, container boxes have been lying at ports, railyards and in warehouses as the pandemic rages on. In an industry with 25 million containers and some 6,000 ships hauling them, it’s easy to see disruptions as one big headache confined to the shipping world. But each container that’s delayed is economic activity that’s restrained, heaping costs one box at a time on consumers and making it more challenging to put corn on consumers’ tables or deliver presents for the holidays.

The World Economy’s Supply Chain Problem Keeps Getting Worse

It’s also a lesson in the ripple effects across global supply chains, showing the limits of diversification as all networks are still closely connected with China.

“All roads lead back to China, and that has a major effect across the entire supply chain,” said Dawn Tiura, head of U.S.-based Sourcing Industry Group. “Congestion at one port or factory has far-reaching implications for neighboring facilities, which trickles out across the world.”

An Arduous JourneyCovid outbreaks, extreme weather and the broader congestion in the global supply-chain network have stretched a delivery that ordinarily would take weeks to more than half a year.

Sources: IM-EX Global; Bloomberg reporting


THE FACTORYThe journey for our particular box of sandy-looking ammonium phosphate began in February. That’s when, deep in the agricultural heartland of the U.S. Midwest, a supplier for farmers in Illinois placed an order for eight container boxes filled with fertilizer from factories in central China.

Before the pandemic, a batch like this would typically arrive in Chicago in April, just in time for growers to use during planting season, said Steve Kranig, director of logistics at IM-EX Global Inc., which is in charge of coordinating transport for the fertilizer cargo.

But by May some of the fertilizer was still sitting in Chongqing, 2,400 kilometers west of Shanghai, where it was manufactured. The culprit: a shortage of empty containers for transport. The crucial return of these steel boxes from trips to the U.S. and Europe has been delayed by everything from understaffing to a lack of trucking equipment to move goods out of ports.

It took Kranig months to secure boxes and spots on several ships that would leave from Shanghai. The fertilizer was loaded into the containers, and they were driven to barge vessels on the Yangtze River.

THE RIVER
The trip down China’s busiest inland waterway took eight days. This container was lucky as it was shipped ahead of typhoon season. Others recently haven’t been so fortunate.

Traffic on the Yangtze, which saw a record 2.93 billion tons of cargo pass through in 2019, has been battered as waves of extreme weather swept across China this summer. Authorities have had to close the river during storms, creating severe backlogs at Chinese ports as ships wait days for passage to resume.



Cargo ships sail along Yangtze River in Wuhan in Hubei Province of China.

Photographer: Zhao Jun/VCG/Getty Images

While the shipment avoided any flooding disasters, it couldn’t escape high transit costs, as freight rates have skyrocketed on international routes as well as along the Yangtze. In addition to high demand for goods as China’s economy rebounds, the scarcity of vessels is pushing prices higher. Shipping lines are pulling smaller coastal vessels away to use on long-haul routes like the lucrative Trans-Pacific from China to the U.S.

“There is already a limited amount of containers that run the Yangtze River lane, and some companies are paying top dollar to take any available containers so they don’t have to try to move their stuff to Shanghai via non-water routes,” said Kranig.

The container finally arrived in Shanghai on May 27 and a truck delivered it to the world’s busiest port.

THE PORT
Kranig isn’t sure why the container is still stuck in Shanghai while seven other boxes of the shipment found their way to Chicago, but he suspects the chaos that hit Chinese ports is a major factor. The pandemic has thrown shipping into upheaval over the past year and a half, with China becoming a major choke point.

Yantian port in Shenzhen was closed in May because of a Covid outbreak, creating congestion for the entire eastern coast, which in turn caused ripple effects across the global supply chain. Earlier this month, shipping also had to be redirected away from Ningbo, the world’s third-busiest container port, after one employee tested positive for Covid.

Typhoons and extreme weather have made matters worse. In July, the stranded container withstood Typhoon In-Fa, shutting Shanghai and other nearby ports for about four days.

Uphill BattleContainer exports out of China are facing more delays than normal on virus outbreaks, typhoons

A positive percentage indicates the number of ships reporting delays were higher than the average for the period from May 2 to Aug. 14.

Source: FourKites



Delays could reach an all-time high in the weeks ahead if the trend persists, said Glenn Koepke, a senior vice president at FourKites Inc., a supply-chain information provider.

For now, the unlucky box of fertilizer remains stranded among the stacks at the port, buried like the crate in the final scene of “ Raiders of the Lost Ark.”

THE PACIFIC AND BEYOND
Once the fertilizer finally hitches a ride to the U.S., the risks aren’t over. The Pacific can be a treacherous crossing for ship captains racing to meet deadlines. And when the cargo safely arrives on the North American coast, more headaches await.

Why Shipping by Sea Struggled to Adapt to Pandemic: QuickTake

The biggest U.S. trade gateway with Asia has been clogged with the most inbound container vessels in more than six months. Earlier this month, 35 ships were anchored awaiting berth space outside the twin ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, California. Because of the backup, many ships are being diverted to Vancouver.

Next comes the inland journey. It could take another one to three months for the container to get from a West Coast port to Chicago by rail or truck.



Cargo container ships outside the Port of Long Beach in Long Beach, California, earlier in August.

Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/AFP/Getty Images

ANOTHER TRIP
The case of the stranded container seems like the worst nightmare for anyone involved in global trade. But Kranig is back for another round of orders -- eight more containers to get from China to the U.S.

The pattern of delays is repeating. Again there were no empty boxes in Chongqing, so Kranig decided to skip the river route -- he loaded the fertilizer in loose, sandy form in open trucks that were driven to a warehouse in Shanghai. The cargo was packed into containers, with some brought to Ningbo this month. Then came news that a part of Ningbo port was shut because of a worker infected with coronavirus.

“It’s an uphill battle,” said Kranig.

— With assistance by Jin Wu, and Brendan Murray

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.
LEARN MORE

Sent from my iPad



To: sense who wrote (177430)8/31/2021 10:43:00 PM
From: Maple MAGA 1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217574
 
I know most of those companies, I've even worked with a couple of them. Only a few of them are mine finders, the rest are speculators who would not know gold from pyrite.



To: sense who wrote (177430)8/31/2021 10:43:12 PM
From: Maple MAGA 1 Recommendation

Recommended By
maceng2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217574
 
“THE ORE FINDERS”

by Siegfried Muessig



What makes for success in exploration? Is it money? Is it superior technology? Is it the presence of superior scientists? Is it superior and persistent organizations?

All these attributes are desirable and their presence will enhance the chances of success; but we've all seen examples of well-funded, capable organizations that find nothing though they do some of the right things, such as exploring in the trends and using the latest models and technology.

What then are the critical ingredients without which no exploration group is going to make discoveries, except through blind luck or brute force? Much has been written about exploration philosophy, and many colleagues such as Paul Bailly and Stan Holmes have made important contributions to the literature on the subject. For the most part, however, they and others have concentrated on the character of the organization and on the scientific, technological, financial, and political aspects of a successful exploration effort. Indeed, of the "five main ingredients of exploration success" given by Brian Mackenzie, the 1992 Denver Region Exploration Geologists Society (DREGS) Distinguished Lecturer, four are organizational and the other states the one we all put first: superior scientific and technical skills.

To have any chance of success, an exploration effort has to be geologically and economically well-conceived, directed, and executed. It has to be well funded, well-staffed, organized effectively, and has to assess the political risk in the areas in which it operates. The unit has to have relaxed and open communications, and distinctive and strong leadership

These attributes deal solely with what we might call the front end of the exploration process, and reflect, as does the literature, the philosophy needed to guide the exploration organization.Together with the principles driving them, they deal with effectiveness and efficiency, which are laudable characteristics, but do not establish a real basis for successful exploration. They deal mostly with the scientific, technological, and management aspects of the organization — and there is general agreement as to the importance of these factors.

However, very few authors have dealt with the role of the individual and his or her desirable characteristics. Those that have talk about "hunger", "motivation", "vigor", "inquisitiveness," "persistence", etc. These are great qualities, no doubt, but they are not enough; we have all seen hungry, motivated, and vigorous failures.

In what follows I will concentrate on the behavior, attitudes, and most importantly, the philosophical approach of individuals, as they alone make the decisions leading to discovery. Organizations, as such, do nothing! They only set a permissive and favorable climate in which individuals act. Exploration is like research; it is an intellectual activity and it is the decisions and actions of individuals, not their organizations that lead to that discovery hole

I want to emphasize, therefore, what we might call the tail end of the exploration process, the operational phase, where the actions and decisions of individuals, not organizations, come into play. It is these actions and decisions, I submit, that are the added critical ingredient of successful exploration.

How, then, can we guide the individuals, be they exploration managers or field geologist? Or, put another way, what philosophy and principles can guide the successful explorer, the ore finder?

I propose a set of principles--exploration canons--that should be part of the intellectual equipment of ore finders, actual or wanna be.

The exploration process is moved along the track toward discovery, or failure, by cumulative actions and decisions, made in parallel or in sequence by individuals. Thus, one or more individuals determine the direction of the track. A basic premise is that most decisions are not made by consensus. One needs sound advice, but not a cast of thousands to make operational decisions. Group decisions tend to average out good ideas until they reach mediocrity! If there is to be much of a chance of success, these individuals and their colleagues should be guided by the philosophy expressed and inherent in the proposed principles—the exploration canons

My thoughts are obviously not all original. As is the case with most of us, I have been exposed over the years to wise individuals, all of whom influenced my thoughts and professional attitudes. Therefore, with thanks to my unnamed mentors, I hope that my thoughts might stimulate discussion and perhaps reduce the time and money needed to find that next ore body

I want to preface my thoughts with an observation of Charles Park, ". . . getting in close is the art of geology." One obviously needs to know the geology of the area being studied, and of the deposits that occur or may occur there. Be realistic about the geologic permissiveness of the area and develop a realistic model, one that distinguishes observations and facts from inferences and hopes. This aspect of the exploration process—the good science part—is not all that difficult. Many unsuccessful organizations are scientifically sound. Good science does not necessarily generate or trigger good exploration. It is what is done with the data that is important. Attention to the proposed canons will improve the odds for discovery.

The Exploration Canons:

• Exploration is not a science. The aims of exploration are fundamentally at odds with those of science. Science seeks understanding, whereas exploration seeks discovery, by whatever means, with or without understanding. Paraphrasing John Ridge (CIM 1983), the way the ore gets there is really of no concern in the search for ore. The empirical model is more useful than the generic one. If I had to pick a basic flaw in the philosophical approach of many organizations to exploration, it would be here. Many geologists tend to ignore or disbelieve data and observations simply because they cannot explain them or no scientific cause can be established. As a result, many either walk away or they over-geologize and then walk away. Consider a classic case: the Wegener hypothesis of continental drift was derided primarily because no understandable cause could be developed, so plate tectonics lay "undiscovered" for many years.
It follows that one should:

• Go with the facts, forget the theory. If there is a question of genesis vs. empirical derived facts or observations, go with the facts, forget the theory, ignore the model. For example, in a drilling program, when the physical model has been. tested, considerations of the genetic model, whether understood or not, should have no bearing on the decision to drop or continue
Let me illustrate my experience at Escondida. The alteration pattern at Escondida fit the classic halo of the porphyry copper model and five holes drilled through alluvial cover in the most "prospective" area were all blank. A secondary target did not fit the model, but was drilled because of the favorable appearance of the leached capping and the presence of a coincident geochemical anomaly; the first hole hit the ore body

• The odds are best in the shadow of the head frame. This obvious, important principle reflects the fact that ore forming processes tend to occur as multiple events and produce multiple deposits in favorable geologic settings. This is not to say there cannot be isolated deposits such as Bingham, or the cryolite at Ivigtut, or the Kramer borax deposit. However, since deposits do tend to occur in clusters, the odds are improved by exploring in or close to mineral districts, the identified mineral trends, or the extensions of trends. Some groups tend to shy away from expensive district or trend land plays, preferring to go where ground is cheaper. But remember, where land is cheap, it's cheap! .

• Do not chase spurious anomalies. Unless the model, or other knowledge of the local geology account for an unexpected anomaly, either geophysical or geochemical, disregard it and continue with the program at hand.

• Do not be preoccupied with explaining anomalies. If the drill hole or other evidence has tested the anomaly and there is no evidence of an ore body, walk away, even though the anomaly is not explained. If, however, in the geologic environment being explored there is strong correlation between certain kinds of anomalies and ore, or conditions that are guides to ore, then perhaps more effort should go into trying to explain the anomalies. The key here is that the anomaly itself is tested. If it is blank, it's best to walk away.

• Do not be preoccupied with pathfinders. Generally speaking, the metal sought is its own best pathfinder. Some groups are enamored of expensive multi-element surveys, but John Prochnau claims that he has never seen a gold discovery in which indirect evidence--geochemistry or geophysics--played the principal role. Some use arsenic as a pathfinder for gold, claiming that its halo is larger than that of gold and therefore sampling can have a lower density. I am not convinced.

• Do not be preoccupied with stereotyped concepts. Avoid overemphasis of such qualities as "ground preparation", "leakage", and yes, structural control, unless they can be clearly correlated with the occurrence of ore in the geologic setting or district being explored. These factors should not override the significance of ore intercepts or other favorable drill-hole or sample results.
For years the conventional wisdom in the Republic, Washington, district was that pyroclastic rocks were poor ore hosts; when the drill hit pyroclastic rocks, the hole was stopped. As a consequence, the three ore intercepts of the Golden Promise ore body vein system, drilled in pyroclastic rocks in 1963, were ignored for over 20 years until further work showed that veins in pyroclastics do "make ore."

• Try for the definitive test. An absolute essential of the "exploration kit" should be the concept of the "definitive test". One should constantly strive to test the target with the drill as soon as possible. If the test is negative, walk away, unless new ideas or data from the drilling justify further work. Too many geologists become victims of excessive scientific arguments and do more work, even though the target could have been adequately tested relatively quickly with the drill. Sometimes it costs more to reduce risk than to take it by drilling.

• Save the agonizing for mineralized trends. Generally speaking, in virgin areas, those without mines or prospects, unless early drilling of targets gets results, it is better to walk away. However, even negative results can lead to meaningful reassessment of the prospect, especially of geophysical or geochemical anomalies. From this might emerge a quite different interpretation or a new set of drill targets? This may be especially true in deeply weathered terrain or in the search for deep blind ore bodies.

• Look for ore, not mineralization. Mineralization furnishes clues, and in the early stages of exploration, mineralization (alteration) may lead to ore, but at the target stage, you should be looking for ore. An important corollary is:

• To find an ore body, you have to drill ore holes. This may seem to be stating the obvious, but each of us knows of deposits that have been over-drilled in the vain hope of improving the grade. Mineral deposits, by definition, have to have continuity and grade to become ore bodies. It follows, that if an "ore hole" cannot be offset by others, there probably is no ore body there. Continued drilling usually results in finding more mineralization or alteration, neither of which can be put through the mill!

• There needs to be room for the ore. This is such an obvious principle that is often ignored when drilling out a deposit. Is there actually room for the tonnage needed to make an ore body, or are there structural, stratigraphic, or other constraints on the necessary space? The more known about the detailed geology of the prospective area, the less attention should be paid to the model and the more given to this principle.

• Improve it or drop it. Unless a property is improved, generally, at each stage of exploration, you should walk away, especially in virgin territory.

• Do not be technology driven. Some organizations fall in love with a given geophysical method, with geophysics itself or with other indirect methods, such as satellite imagery, and overuse them, when more direct, simpler methods, such as mapping, sampling, and drilling will give faster, cheaper, and more definitive results.

• Acquire first, study later. It is amazing how this basic principle is so often ignored. When a discovery is made and the land play is on, some groups insist on taking samples or doing other work before making a commitment As a consequence, they are commonly left with fringe acreage or a competitor gets the deal.

• Disregard competitor's previous actions. Do not base exploration strategy on your supposition of the reasons behind a competitor's previous action in the area you're exploring. If the available data compel you to a course of action, take up the ground and plan a series of drill holes; do not be swayed by imagined scenarios of why a previous holder dropped the ground.

• Go for the jugular. If you have faith in your geology and judgement of the potential of an area, do not take half-way cheap measures; take the bold strokes that make for discovery, rather than nibbling away at the data.

• It's the drill hole, stupid! The geologist cannot substitute his wisdom and cleverness for the drill hole. The problem here is that the scientist believes in the power of the scientific method: more work, more data ought to do the job. And, therefore more work is done because it "offends" many geologists (scientists) to just drill a hole without understanding the geology. On the other hand, there are those who believe that many prospects can be tested by indirect geophysical means. One geologist on a project with which I was associated once said (and believed), ". . . but we ought to be able to model the anomalies and test them without drilling." Not so!

The authors of "In Search of Excellence" found that the difference between successful and unsuccessful exploration companies is a dramatic difference in the amount of diamond drilling they do. Although diamond or other drilling looks expensive, it is really the only way to find out what is down there

Always remember: IQ gets you there, but NQ finds it!



To: sense who wrote (177430)8/31/2021 10:44:01 PM
From: Maple MAGA   Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217574
 
The Dirty Rotten Secrets of the Small Cap Markets

LAW OF THE PEZ

This is dedicated to Murray Pezim, once the most powerful stock promoter in all of Canada. According to legend, Mr. Pezim, upon hearing that someone had made a killing on his stock play, immediately remarked,

"Shareholder profits are short-term loans." Ultimately, if you continue your small-cap speculations, you will lose. Either the markets will turn or you will drop your guard, but eventually, you will lose.

One should understand that the small cap stock markets run pretty much like a casino.... the longer you stay at the tables, the greater your chances of failure.

MOTTO OF THE STOCK PROMOTER

Sell when everyone is buying and buy when everyone else is selling. Actually, more often it is, sell when everyone else is buying, completely exit the play, and go find something else for them to buy later.

It may even be: Start shorting your deal when you've sold out your entire position so you can score even more profit on the way down. There are corollaries to this motto, such as "never get married to a deal," or "never believe in your own deal," or "have a new deal ready to rock & roll as soon as the current one flops."

LAW OF THE UPTICKS

Stocks that are running higher are said to be upticking. Despite every effort I have made to emphasize that the best time to buy a stock is when it is low and boasts a sorry-looking flatline stock chart, speculators inevitably chase stocks to new highs.

Stock promoters and insiders buy, or obtain a position, at the low and sell during the promotion or "discovery." Sadly, there will always be some type of promotion that will create upticks and speculators will chase that stock to a new level. Greed generates upticks. What stock promoters know that you don't is this law:

A herd of speculators WILL ONLY BUY ON THE UPTICK, every stock promoter knows this.

AXIOM OF GREED

In an earlier essay, I isolated that greed originated from a "perceived" lack of speculative opportunities. This false perception causes a speculator to get greedy and chase a stock to a new level.

If one has a hundred speculative opportunities on their plate, one is less eager to chase any specific stock. The lesser the number of opportunities one reviews, the greedier one becomes to chase a heavily promoted stock. A stock promoter will, thus, make "his stock" appear to look like the only game in town worth playing. Greed essentially emanates from deprivation.

RULE OF CONFUSION

The only time one rushes into a quick decision is when they are confused or disoriented or misled.

The stock promoter's greatest weapon is CONFUSION: Catch a speculator off guard and sucker him into a stock. The more disoriented or confused the speculator, the greater his chances of being snared. Stock promotions include an overwhelming amount of data, reports, corporate reviews and so forth that are packaged in such a way as to confuse the speculator. If, at any time, you are overwhelmed with out-of-control emotions or data which you don't understand, it is better to stay out of the play.

SECRET OF EXCITEMENT

You've heard about the "forbidden fruit" or "unknown pleasures." As long as something remains a mystery, it can create an "excitement." Excitement is a sensation which one commonly associates with pleasure.

Therefore, when an exciting proposition is offered, you may readily accept it in order to experience THAT sensation. When someone heaps excitement after excitement, upon you, in either the written or spoken word and/or with graphics (visuals, photographs, charts, drawings, etc.) and especially in a loud or emphatic manner, you become disoriented and confused.

One overcomes this "sensation of the unknown or forbidden" through experience, often with a rude and unpleasant awakening. Stock promoters abuse your inexperience, and naiveté, to sell you stock. ALL mining speculations are exciting until the assays come back or a mine goes into development. Then reality sets in.

LAW OF WAITING

The longer you wait, the greater your chances for failure. This applies to both holding a stock which is declining and to a stock which is running. The odds are greater than 90% against you... that you will fail in a speculation, if you wait for it to recover or if you chase a stock which has already begun its run.

Generally, a stock moves up in less than two weeks, often in two to five days. The waiting period, for a stock to allegedly recover, is the slow, dragged out retreat you later observe in the share price.

As believers stop believing, the share price declines, often never recovering. Of course, if one wants to wait forever, then eventually the stock may recover. The longer one waits, during a runup, the smaller one's potential profits and the greater one's exposure to losses.

(One important caveat: Occasionally, there are a few good deals--about 20 or 30 annually--when one SHOULD wait for the company to mature. Almost always, they come out of left field and, rarely, does anyone know in advance which company will become tomorrow's success story.)

AXIOM OF BELIEVING

The higher your expectations in a stock, the greater your chances of losing money (toot toot posters )in that speculation. All of the promotion is geared to make you a "believer." Most speculators are betting on a tip or a rumor. They are taking someone else's "word" for the outcome.

Absolutely no one should invest or speculate in a stock without understanding the risks as well as the reward. Stock promoters create believers by providing ONLY the reward potential, without also including the risk factors. Believers eventually discover the risks, long after the stock has begun its decline.

LAW OF LOSERS

Oddly, those most attracted to speculative markets are failures in other aspects of their lives. They may be wealthy, but consider themselves, in some way, as having "failed."

Medical doctors are prime targets of stock promoters, as they are not only affluent may have "settled for less" in their lives or feel they "are owed more" for the work they do. Whoever has failed, in some key aspect of their life, often tries to make up for it by gambling....often speculating in these markets.

The loser is always trying to compensate for a failure in another part of his life and continues to heavily lose as a speculator. (Note: I stay in touch with certain losers and use them as a yardstick for my trading -- when they buy, I sell; when they sell, I buy. The loser has a knack for exiting his position, a day or a week before a major runup; or he/she simply always buys at the top of the runup.

The downside to communicating with losers is that they are so darned indecisive and fretters; their worrying can and does rub off and creates a confusion for oneself.)

LAW OF THE SUCKER

PT Barnum was right: A sucker is born every minute. For every speculator that is wiped out, a fresh one is champing at the bit to start betting. Stock promoters prop up their plays by finding new blood to drain. The greener the speculator, the redder the carpet laid out for him. If there were no new suckers coming into the game, it would all be over.



To: sense who wrote (177430)8/31/2021 10:45:46 PM
From: Maple MAGA   Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217574
 
JUNGLE FEVER THE BRE-X SAGA IS THE GREATEST GOLD SCAM EVER. BUT TO UNDERSTAND THE ENORMITY OF THE FRAUD, YOU HAD TO BE THERE. OUR MAN IN BORNEO TELLS HIS STORY.

By RICHARD BEHAR

June 9, 1997

(FORTUNE Magazine) – When I stepped off the plane in Jakarta, I was, like the rest of the world's lemmings, swept up in the Bre-X Minerals euphoria. The Canadian company had found the largest gold deposit of the century, buried deep underground in a dense Indonesian jungle on the island of Borneo. As Bre-X vice chairman John Felderhof later explained to me, a volcano had essentially "collapsed back onto itself" three million years ago, causing a massive buildup of heat and pressure, which created the miraculous treasure. He drew a diagram. It made sense. After all, he was on his eighth beer of the evening; I was on my fourth. What's more, everyone believed him--fellow geologists, engineers, financial analysts, business journalists, the world's largest mining companies, government officials, even a former U.S. President. "Geologically, it's the most brilliant thing I've ever seen in my life," Felderhof sputtered. "It's so big, it's scary. It's f--ing scary!"

Horrifying is a better word. Bre-X was a gold-mining hoax--the largest of any century--until it collapsed onto itself last month. Allegedly thousands of rock samples were "salted" with flakes of gold before they were tested. Today Felderhof is rich and sends his regrets from the Cayman Islands, where he professes his innocence and is applying for permanent residency. His deputy geologist, Mike de Guzman, is not so fortunate, having apparently jumped 800 feet into the jungle from a helicopter once the jig was up. Bre-X CEO David Walsh is holed up at the company's Calgary headquarters, scuffling with camera crews. Class-action lawsuits are flying, while criminal investigators are poring over the company's books.

The numbers are heart-stopping. The market value of Bre-X had topped $4 billion--a growth rate of 100,000% in three years. In early May the company melted into bankruptcy. But not before Walsh, his wife, and Felderhof had mined roughly $50 million from stock sales. And the gold? In the weeks before the fraud was exposed, some 71 million ounces of the yellow metal, worth $25 billion at today's prices, had supposedly been "proven" by Bre-X. Then Felderhof said he was "comfortable" with 200 million ounces--far more than the California gold rush. One Bre-X official told me "400 million."

The numbers tell only part of the story. To grasp the enormity of the scam, you had to be there. You had to see the cosmos that Bre-X had created, like an elaborate Hollywood set with hundreds of actors who could be loaded onto trucks and barges once the tickets had been sold. "You have to understand, this thing is like a 20-foot man," gushed Research Capital mining analyst Chad Williams after returning from an early pilgrimage. "For someone in our business, it's like taking the biggest Elvis fan to Graceland."

I spent two weeks in Indonesia in February to chronicle an epic tale of how a bunch of average Joes stumbled onto the holy grail, only to find powerful and greedy forces conspiring to take it away from them. Felderhof told me only one other publication (the Northern Miner) had ever been permitted inside Busang, the exploration camp on the island of Borneo. I felt lucky. I proved even luckier when I returned to New York with an illness that delayed my story for several weeks. ("Saved by a parasite," FORTUNE managing editor John Huey now says.) We held our fire again after Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Bre-X's new partner, said it was conducting its own drilling tests--the first time in nearly four years anyone independent had checked beneath the surface. Looking back, I don't have the answers. But the trip provided a fascinating look at several characters who may be the century's greatest scam artists.

By the time I got to Indonesia, both Walsh and Felderhof were trapped in a Javanese version of It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, the timeless movie farce in which Mickey Rooney, Milton Berle, and a slew of other characters try to outsleaze one another in a manic race to recover buried treasure. The Bre-X version came complete with payola, private eyes, and break-ins. It led from the leech-infested swamps of Borneo to the presidential palace in polluted Jakarta. It featured a dictator's greedy kids and some of the world's biggest mining firms, stabbing one another in the dark.

The story is familiar now. For nearly a year, until Freeport was awarded the contract, the Indonesian government had delayed giving Bre-X control over Busang. Big mining companies jockeyed for position. As the gold estimates grew, Indonesian officials were determined to select an established firm as the operator. Mining giants were lobbying for the post, none harder than Peter Munk, CEO of Toronto's Barrick Gold, the world's second-largest gold producer. Munk hired Kroll Associates, the world's biggest detective agency, to dig up dirt on Bre-X in anticipation of a hostile takeover bid. He enlisted former U.S. President George Bush to lobby Suharto, the Indonesian ruler. He retained the services of a daughter of Suharto to get an edge. (Bre-X offered $40 million to a son.)

When I arrived in early February, Jakarta had become a corporate war zone centered on five-star fortresses. Bre-X was at the Shangri-La (the "Bre-X Shangri-La"). From his window Walsh could see the enemy--the "Barrick Hyatt." Just up the road, at the Regent Hotel, a Houston lawyer was assembling spies to help him figure out whom to sue on behalf of Bre-X shareholders. It was impossible to figure out what was going on. The man holding the cards: Suharto's golfing buddy, a secretive timber tycoon named Mohamad "Bob" Hasan. The dictator had asked him to clean up the Bre-X mess. At one point it wasn't clear whom Suharto's government was favoring as Bre-X's partner. "This place is like Casablanca," complained Doug MacIntosh, Bre-X's investment banker at J.P. Morgan. "The story changes every day."

In Jakarta, I talked with Walsh, Felderhof, and other Bre-X officials dozens of times. We met separately. We met together at lunches and dinners. Not once did a yellow flag go up during those talks. Were they all just playing their parts in an elaborate scheme? If so, they were playing those parts quite well.

Even now, I have trouble believing that Walsh participated in the scam. He was a miserable soul when we were introduced in his Jakarta suite, just hours after he'd had it swept for electronic bugs. He was chain-smoking Dunhills and hacking his brains out. He hadn't exercised in years, he said, which was apparent from a huge deposit hanging over his belt. He was depressed and distracted, and often stared out his window at the litter and sewage that flowed continuously down a muddy canal--a metaphor, we joked, for the corruption that thrived in Indonesia. "We all find it hard to believe that we're responsible for the largest gold discovery probably in the history of the world," he said without much feeling. Indeed, Walsh looked more like some poor schlemiel who had just won the lottery and couldn't locate the ticket.

Walsh told me his story: A former stockbroker, he launched Bre-X in 1989. He hunted for gold in Quebec and joined a diamond rush in the Northwest Territories. His luck was so abysmal that he opened his 1991 annual report with the line "Yes, we are still in business." After filing for personal bankruptcy, he decided he needed "a proven gold finder." Enter Felderhof, whose claim to fame was the co-discovery of one of the world's biggest silver and gold mines in Papua New Guinea in 1968. It took Walsh two weeks to track down Felderhof, whom he hadn't seen in ten years. Using his last $10,000, Walsh flew to Indonesia, where Felderhof talked him into buying the rights to part of the Busang property in 1993.

Looking back, maybe I should have been suspicious when I met the Dutch-born Felderhof. He had a shifty mug, a gruff manner, and a hideous laugh trapped in the back of his throat ("Kkh! Kkh! Kkh!...Kkh! Kkh! Kkh!"). Still, his talent for storytelling made him more enjoyable than Walsh. Here was a pirate without the eye patch--a hard-drinking, swashbuckling explorer who had prowled the world's jungles, dodging flash floods and poisonous snakes. He wore his 14 bouts with malaria like medals on his chest. He said he was so poor that in 1992 he had to steal a Christmas tree for his family. Never again. He pulled out a photo of Ingrid, his second wife. "She just bought me a Lamborghini for Christmas," he said. "It's two seats strapped to a f--ing engine. I think she's trying to kill me. Kkh! Kkh! Kkh!"

Shortly after we met, Felderhof took me to dinner with de Guzman, his longtime pal whom he'd invited to join the Bre-X team. The Filipino geologist beamed like a jewel when Felderhof explained that he couldn't have discovered the gold without his deputy's "pioneering theories." De Guzman boasted that his IQ ranged from 150 to 170, which came in handy when he hiked 32 kilometers through dense jungle "with the camp on my back, eating noodles every meal for a week," and hunting for signs of mineralization. The first two drill holes were failures. "We almost closed the property," recalled de Guzman. "In December 1993 John said, 'Close the property,' and then we made the hit." Never mind that more than a dozen mining companies had dismissed the property as worthless. The previous operator had even drilled 19 holes, but "they were all in the wrong places," snickered Felderhof during the meal. Or they were "too shallow." Or the workers used a wet-drilling method that, ironically, washed away whatever gold they did strike. "Geology wasn't on their minds," added Felderhof. "They were spending all their time in town chasing girls and naming creeks after them." De Guzman, who, as it turns out, had at least four wives simultaneously, laughed as he recalled the various creeks--"Karen, Jenny, Martha, Ann." After consulting with a local tribe of Christian Dayaks, he gave the creeks back their traditional names.

As I continued my work, things got tense. Walsh complained about a break-in at his Calgary office; two weeks earlier his wife had found a spy rifling through the garbage at their Bahamas estate. He claims he sent a memo advising employees to "shred sensitive materials." (If true, that will make it harder for investigators to solve the mystery.) The company's top financial officer, Rolando Francisco, was also caught up in the hysteria. He would talk in his hotel room only after cranking up the volume on the TV. Over at the Hyatt, Barrick spokesman Luc Lavoie was waxing philosophical: "If this was the biggest oil discovery, so what? More oil. But gold is different...It brings up more emotions. It clouds the minds of people." It clearly fogged the mind of his client. I later learned that Barrick, last November, couldn't find gold in many Bre-X samples. "This can't be a scam!" Munk screamed at his deputies. "Do some more tests! Figure it out! I know it's there, okay? You confirm it's there."

I looked forward to seeing the gold. After four days in Jakarta, Felderhof joined me on the flight to Balikpapan, the only place in Borneo with a runway big enough to handle the plane. During the trip he explained that Bre-X had spent more than $1 million on a social-development program for the tribe of Christian Dayaks that comprised the bulk of the 400 workers. "I've always been interested in developing people," he said. From Balikpapan, it was an exhilarating two-hour jaunt in a helicopter to Busang. The dense, swampy jungle stretched as far as the eye could see. Felderhof leaned over and said that a chopper once made an emergency landing in the area. "When the pilot was found, four days later, his body was covered with leeches," yelled Felderhof, over the roar of the engine. "Kkh! Kkh! Kkh!" Little did I know that, six weeks later, Felderhof's sidekick, de Guzman, would apparently throw himself out of the same chopper we were sitting in. It would also take four days to find the body, which had been partly devoured by wild pigs and other creatures.

Once on the ground, you would never know that this wasn't the real deal. What a production! If Busang was a Hollywood set, the 2,000 Dayaks were the extras. Bre-X had electrified their village, built a new church, opened a kindergarten, and organized sewing classes for the local women. A swath of jungle had been cleared for an airport. Bre-X planned to open a fishery and a poultry-farming venture to enable the tribe to sell products to the mine.

I shared a cigar with a young villager who had just received a scholarship from Bre-X to study engineering. I met Pebit, the barefoot Dayak leader, as he was helping construct new homes for the workers--a tribal Levittown, courtesy of Bre-X. Through a translator, Pebit boasted that it was his decision to sacrifice a pig to God that "allowed the gold to be pulled from the ground." Then there was the army of young geologists working the site. At the exploration camp, I drank Bintang (a local beer) deep into the night with ten of these workers, many of whom were fresh out of geology school in Canada, Indonesia, or the Philippines. As we listened to wild monkeys screech like sirens in the darkness, the young men talked about the rigors of life in the bush. They complained about the grueling work schedule (eight weeks on, two weeks off) and the lack of sex. But they believed they were making history. They were the geological equivalent of batboys for the World Champion Yankees. They didn't know that they were pawns in a crooked game that was fixed from the get-go.

After two days, my tour was over. I saw no gold. But then again, I didn't know what real gold was supposed to look like buried in those long, tubular core samples. My return trip included a seven-hour speedboat ride down the narrow Mahakam River with Cesar Puspos, de Guzman's 36-year-old deputy. We spent the day waving to the locals, who lived in shabby huts and washed in the muddy water they used for defecation. Puspos, by contrast, had struck it rich. He drove a BMW. He described how de Guzman, "my mentor," awakened him in the middle of the night in a frenzy to announce that he had solved Busang's geological puzzle. When we arrived at Bre-X's office in the city of Samarinda, I noticed huge piles of core sample bags and persuaded Puspos to climb atop for a picture. Investigators say Bre-X's samples were "probably" salted in Samarinda before being delivered to testing labs in Balikpapan. (Walsh had once said that the bags were transported directly from Busang to the labs.)

After a few more days in Jakarta, I returned to the States on February 17. Bre-X soon unraveled. Even then, many believers chose to stay blind. In March, after de Guzman's death, Barrick's Peter Munk told FORTUNE, "I don't believe that those guys salted the mine...you couldn't have fooled that many analysts for that long." When Freeport said its drilling showed "insignificant" gold, Bre-X's flacks at Hill & Knowlton suggested that Freeport was behind a scheme to lower the stock price (see following box). The last time I heard from Walsh, March 20, he left me a phone message confirming some arcane historical facts in my story--a day after de Guzman's death and a week after Freeport called Walsh with the news that they were coming up dry at Busang. This is a crook? Or the Mr. Magoo of mining?

Looking back, some things seemed suspicious. Like the "accidental" fire at Busang that destroyed a building containing de Guzman's papers and visible gold samples. I was also disappointed to see no gold at the century's biggest gold deposit. A geologist, Steve Hughes, took me through the bush to a creek. We panned. We found nothing. "That's strange," said Hughes. "You'd think we'd find something." The next day I needled Felderhof, telling him I had bad news for Bre-X. "No gold, huh?" he snapped back. "Kkh! Kkh! Kkh!" There was another peculiar moment. In one of my last meetings in Jakarta with Felderhof, de Guzman walked in. I rose and slapped him on the back, congratulating him on Freeport's emerging as Bre-X's new partner. He should have been thrilled. Instead, he was stone cold. Grim. Icy. He didn't even look at me. It was clear he wanted to talk to Felderhof alone.

No matter who pulled off the crime, Bre-X has left a mother lode of victims--from individual investors to the poor tribal people counting on the mine to earn a meager living. But even the pros got burned in this tale of greed. Recently I caught up with MacIntosh of J.P. Morgan, the Bre-X banker. We'd shared several meals in Jakarta, where he jabbered for hours about how the gold mine would be the most lucrative in the world. Doug is a mining engineer with 30 years of experience. I was curious how it felt to be suckered. "I have been surprised at every turn of this thing," he said, noting how fortunate I was that we had held the presses. "I hope that we're as lucky as you have been." Not a chance, mate.



To: sense who wrote (177430)8/31/2021 10:47:31 PM
From: Maple MAGA   Respond to of 217574
 
The Windy Craggy Experience

Mary Page Webster

I first learned of the Windy Craggy copper-cobalt deposit when I was a student working towards my degree in Geology. Geddes Resources Ltd. was exploring the property and the president of Geddes (my father) showed me some surface samples. The massive sulphides in the samples indicated that Windy Craggy was one of the most important mineral finds in North America.

Windy Craggy is in the Tatshenshini Area of Northwestern British Columbia, about an hour west of Whitehorse by helicopter. The area is isolated with no ready surface access, and no permanent residents. It is not prime hunting and fishing territory. In fact, the only person working a trapline in the area at the time it was explored was a man named Yurg Hoffer, who had emigrated from Switzerland. His trapline extended along the west side of the Haines Road from about the Yukon Border to the Alaska border near Haines—a distance of about 40 miles. The scenery in the area is typical of the Rocky Mountains which extend northwest through Alaska, and south through the western United States and into Mexico.

My first visit to Windy Craggy was as part of an exploration team several years after I graduated. I spent much of the next 10 years working in the area, including in the Yukon and BC. For four of these years I was exploration manager for Geddes Resources.

In that time, Geddes spent a total of about $50 million on exploration. However, neither the company, nor its investors, nor BC workers, nor Canadians in general will ever benefit from the work done to discover and delineate the massive copper reserve or any of the other ore bodies that most certainly exist in the area. Instead, these reserves are today part of a 5 million hectare United Nations World Heritage Site—by far the largest World Heritage Site in North America.

The excluded mineral deposits in the Tatshenshini area are among the largest known in the world. The Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources placed a value of $15 billion on metal contained in the Windy Craggy deposit. Geddes Re-sources' estimate was $8.5 billion. (These figures are based on the probable and proven reserves without taking into consideration the extensions and indicated reserves of Windy Craggy).

The economic contribution of the mine would have been immense. The Commission on Resources and Environment of British Columbia indicated that initial capital investment would have been $550 million, plus an annual average expenditure of $150 million. Employment would have included 500 direct jobs plus another 1,500 indirect jobs. Some estimates gave the mine a minimum life of 50 years. Geddes estimated the gross direct taxes to federal and provincial coffers at almost $1.3 billion. The Ministry's estimate was even higher—$1.6 billion. All those billions of dollars were tied to Windy Craggy alone. Many millions of acres remain unexplored.

What happened next? Premier Harcourt's government introduced project review legislation and this, of course, introduced elements of uncertainty into Geddes' plans for Windy Craggy and every other mining project in British Columbia.

Initially, the review process was to be completed in just a few months. In fact, it ran for years and was never completed. My initial perception of how long the process would take was based on what the government termed the "one window" approach. This was supposed to streamline the permitting process. However, the process was not streamlined at all. Instead, we learned that Geddes Resources would have to meet US environmental standards as well as Canadian federal and BC provincial standards.

The lack of readily available government data proved to be another obstacle. In order to obtain what was considered basic information needed to complete the reviews, I ended up installing and personally managing the first weather, seismic, and river gauge stations in the region. Topographic maps were not available, as the region was classified as unsurveyed, and many times, at the company's expense, my geologic talents were drawn upon to count goats, moose, and wolves many miles away from the deposit itself.

During this period the company's capital was tied up and our investors were at a great disadvantage. In addition, the review process took a major portion of executive time and added hundreds of thousands of dollars in costs for lawyers, experts, support staff and travel.

Many submissions were delivered to the governments. However, the press soon reported that Sheila Copps, in consultation with US Vice-President Al Gore, had endorsed the creation of a massive World Heritage Site.

When this announcement was made, it was beyond my comprehension that the BC, US, and Canadian governments really wanted to close to any development an area the size of Vancouver Island. Moreover, they did so without any public discussions or hearings, without parliamentary debate, and with only minimal last minute discussions with First Nations.

What happened to Windy Craggy is indicative of a trend against the mining and investment industries in North America—a trend that is also producing some unpleasant consequences.

To begin with, the unique mineral deposits in the Tatshenshini area—among the largest known in the world—are now part of a World Heritage Site under the control of bureaucrats appointed by a UN agency. This "taking" without fair process and without good reason has led mining company managers, who are responsible to their shareholders, to shift the bulk of their exploration planning and budgets out of BC. This has resulted in much of Canada's exploration and mining expertise finding its way abroad—to areas as far away as the former Soviet Union, Latin America, China, and sub-Saharan Africa. Some exploration continues, of course, by companies with BC government-assisted financing or by companies with large operations, such as smelters, which obviously cannot be moved. Many companies also maintain a minimal presence in B.C. in the hope that someday an electorate more receptive to mineral exploration, responsible policies, and employment will return a like-minded government to power.

Mining companies cannot shut down existing programs overnight, but the number of jobs in mining in British Columbia will certainly continue to decline as reserves are depleted and new mines are not developed to replace them. In contrast, spending on exploration in the Yukon has exploded as exploration expenditures have fallen in BC.

There has been an unprecedented demand for Canadian exploration and mining expertise overseas in jurisdictions which have managed to have both ongoing exploration programs and tough environmental rules. These areas are already marketing the minerals discovered and produced using Canadian expertise and capital. Offshore producers are filling the void left by a declining Canadian mining industry and are meeting the world demand for metals.

What have Canadians gained from the establishment of this World Heritage Site? Very little. The world now has an immense park one hour by helicopter from Whitehorse. But don't go to the airport in Whitehorse and expect to be able to charter a flight to see or visit it. You have to apply for a permit to fly into the area.

On the other hand, what have we lost from the establishment of this World Heritage Site? We have lost access to a major coastal mineral terrain which extends North and South through Alaska. The loss of this area most certainly will have long term implications for Canada's competitive position as a supplier of resources in the world market.

Mining itself represents only about 5 percent of the province's economic activity, but without mining and the encouragement to develop new and large mines, all industries that support it . . . will suffer immensely

The mining industry is both expected, and indeed required, to open its books and offer full disclosure to the public in the form of discussions, reporting, research, and hearings prior to receiving permission to open a mine. In creating the new mega World Heritage Site, the governments involved acted behind closed doors, held no open hearings, and requested no submissions from the general public. Such action does not generate investor confidence in BC's mining industry, nor are citizens afforded the opportunity to understand the benefits and detriments of such government action, nor given an opportunity to provide their input.

More than one such major Canadian resource and a possible deep water Canadian port that we will need in the years ahead is now under the jurisdiction of a committee appointed by UNESCO—a committee that does not necessarily have Canadian participation. There was no Canadian representative on the committee in 1994 when this unnecessary expropriation took place.

I am well aware that there have been instances of irresponsibility involving the mining industry and the environment over the decades. Some of this was out of ignorance. Some was out of greed. But it was not out of malice; people in the mining industry bear no malice towards Mother nature. Everyone has learned a great deal over the years. All one has to do is look around the province. In many areas mining coexists with other land uses.

We can always hope that at some point the public and the politicians will reverse their decision and allow the unique mineral wealth of the Tatshen-shini region to be developed responsibly and in the best interests of everyone. What is unique about the Tatshenshini region is its tremendous mineral wealth.

The Tatshenshini World Heritage Site is bi-national; it sits mainly in Canada, but includes portions of Alaska to the north and south. The site was proposed by the BC premier's office, and was endorsed by the Prime Minister's office. The American park was established with the concurrence of the executive branch of the US federal government. In other words, almost no locally elected officials on either side of the border were involved in the creation of the massive UN protectorate. World Heritage Sites undoubtedly have a place. But prior to their designation, there is a place for public hearings so that all parties and interest groups can be heard and make a difference.

The total area of British Columbia is approximately 95 million hectares. All the mines ever developed in British Columbia total less that one-tenth of one percent of the this total land mass. In other words, you could tuck all the land disturbed by mining into a corner of the greater Vancouver area.

Provincial and national parks, on the other hand, total about 6 percent of the province. Without new exploration and access to land, our mining industry will languish. Mining itself represents only about 5 percent of the province's economic activity, but without mining and the encouragement to develop new and large mines, all industries that support it, such as transportation, utilities, banking, and the service sectors ranging from catering to equipment manufacturing and sales, will suffer immensely.

It is time that mining antagonists realized that miners today are not despoilers of resources, but rather, the facilitaors of responsible natural resource management and the creators of wealth.