To: Broken_Clock who wrote (2184 ) 9/1/2021 10:06:45 AM From: Les H Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 5955 I've known about that information for almost 15 months, and it makes no difference in whether the coronavirus SARS-COVID-19 was engineered in a lab since the Furin Cleavage Site on the virus can't be created without deleting the genome, other sites on the genome can't be modified without leaving tell-tale signs of manual manipulation, and there are over 9,000 RNA strands in the genome for the SARS workbench that would require modification to match the SARS-COVID-19 genome. You haven't a fucking clue. You need to look in detail at the scenarios created by the lab leaker conspiracy group because they at least tried to specify what sites on the genome had to be altered to achieve the result. It's pretty close to impossible. The Wuhan lab received about 10% of the funds earmarked for the Gain of Function research at UNC-CH. They collected specimens of bats and bat droppings for the US lab. UNC-Chapel and WIV worked together on the project. Facui has said that the actual research is done in the United State at UNC-CH. NIH temporarily banned GOF research funding but grandfathered their projects. Chinese and US scientists genetically engineered bat coronaviruses in dangerous gain-of-function research stretching back years. gmwatch.org You're wasting my time with stupid conspiracy stuff and hanging your hat on single phrase, such as Gain of Function and others, without understanding the mathematical complexity of genetically engineering an exact duplicate of SARS-COVID-19. I think it's rather idiotic that you think $ 120,000 a year will be enough to pay researchers to travel over 1,000 to caves in Yunnan province to collect bats and coronavirus specimens, bring them back to the lab and catalog them, and still have money to hire a team of biomedical researchers to do substantial work on the virus. The average pay in China for one research assistant is nearly $ 300,000.