SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Inco-Voisey Bay Nickel [ T.N.V] -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cumbrian who wrote (158)2/5/1998 3:06:00 PM
From: Winer  Respond to of 1615
 
Geoff: You wrote that: "Mr Tobin and yourself seem to take Voisey's Bay as a given.."

I would like to indicate to you that I have authored none of the Voisey's Bay articles that I have posted here. All of the authors of these articles have been clearly identified in the text of my posts. You therefore have no basis on which to judge my opinion about the Voisey's Bay project, Inco, or Voisey's Bay Nickel. I can assure you that although I have not expressed a personal opinion, I do have a good grip on "reality" with regards to the subject.

"I live in Sudbury so I understand your feelings.."

You may live in Sudbury, but that does not put you in touch with my feelings. With regards to your question about power capabilities for a smelter, I will see what I can find on the subject.



To: Cumbrian who wrote (158)2/5/1998 3:52:00 PM
From: Winer  Respond to of 1615
 
Globe and Mail -- Churchill Falls

GLOBE AND MAIL
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
MON JAN.19,1998 PAGE: A6
BYLINE: Hugh Winsor
WORDS: 735
National Edition
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

The Power Game
Tapping into Churchill Falls' power potential
Hugh Winsor


IN mainland politics, it may seem a stretch to link one of the "last grand colonial projects," as the initial Churchill Falls hydroelectric power development in remotest Labrador was called, to the stirrings over Liberal Leadership 2001.

But when a wily tactician such as Brian Tobin is involved, and when the man to beat holds the purse strings, one should not be surprised at anything. So here is a scenario for some interesting behind-the-scenes manoeuvring. The dramatis personae include the Newfoundland Premier, federal Finance Minister Paul Martin and Ron Bilodeau.

Ron Bilodeau? Unless you are an inner-sanctum Ottawa type, you haven't heard of him, but he is associate clerk of the Privy Council. In this play, consider him a surrogate for Prime Minister Jean Chretien.

The plot revolves around the huge reservoir of untapped hydroelectric power in the Lower Churchill Falls - 3,500 megawatts, or about twice the production of the nuclear plant in Pickering, Ont., if all its reactors were working.

When the late Newfoundland premier Joey Smallwood and his British backers developed the "grand colonial project" at Churchill Falls, they struck a terribly short-sighted deal committing operating company Brinco to sell power to Hydro-Quebec at three-tenths of a cent per kilowatt hour for six decades. Hydro-Quebec is now reselling that power for about 5 cents a kilowatt hour, about 15 times more than it costs.

Now we have a politically savvy and very pro-active Premier of Newfoundland, Mr. Tobin, who is already on a high with Hibernia and the proposed Voisey's Bay megaprojects. To take full advantage of Voisey's Bay, however, Newfoundland will need a lot more power for smelting and so on. Thus Mr. Tobin is pushing development of the Lower Churchill, packaging it as a solution to federal-provincial relations, unemployment and greenhouse gases, for starters.

If the deal comes off, it would showcase Mr. Tobin as a man of vision with the interests of the whole country at heart. Couple that with the French lessons he is taking three times a week, and we have national leadership material.

The $12-billion project would become one of the largest construction jobs in the world, producing thousands of jobs. Because most of the power produced would go to Hydro-Quebec for transmission to New England, Hydro-Quebec could pay enough for the new power to offset some of the unfairness of the original Churchill Falls arrangement.

The deal-breaker, however, is the $2-billion required to build a link across Labrador to bring some of the power to Newfoundland. Hence the pitch to Ottawa for the $2-billion as a long-term soft loan.

Mr. Chretien apparently likes the politics of it, and Quebec Premier Lucien Bouchard believes it could show that partnership works. Mr. Martin apparently has doubts, not so much because of the money, but because he fears making a one-off deal with one or two provinces could open the floodgate for similar demands from other provinces.

The managers of Mr. Tobin's would-be leadership campaign think Mr. Martin's lack of enthusiasm reflects a desire to not make a rival look good. That notion is dismissed by the Finance Minister's seconds as "silly." They say Mr. Martin would not stoop to that level.

Mr. Tobin is advised to redirect his attention to Energy Minister Ralph Goodale and Environment Minister Christine Stewart to sell the scheme as a way to reduce greenhouse gases, because the hydro power will displace fossil-fuel electrical generation.

This is where Mr. Bilodeau comes into the picture, under the direction of Mr. Chretien, to get all the players together at the Privy Council Office and come up with recommendations to be given directly to him (and not to the Finance Minister, the Newfoundlanders note.)

The Bilodeau group, with a representative from Finance, has been beavering away for a couple of months, and the outcome will test the PCO's ability to walk the line between politics and dollars.

If Mr. Chretien is persuaded, he has the power to make the deal happen. If it helps his buddy, Brian, so much the better. As for the Martin people, they say they are not worried about Mr. Tobin. If they were, the Finance Minister wouldn't have gone to Newfoundland recently to speak at a Tobin fund-raising dinner.



To: Cumbrian who wrote (158)2/5/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: Winer  Respond to of 1615
 
Regional News: Voisey's Bay

Globe and Mail
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
THU FEB.05,1998 PAGE: B1 (ILLUS)
BYLINE: ALLAN ROBINSON
WORDS: 879
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Inco, Newfoundland at odds
Firm wants Voisey's processing reassessed; province says no

BY ALLAN ROBINSON
Mining Reporter


Inco Ltd. is pushing Newfoundland to reassess the financial viability of a $1-billion (U.S.) smelter and refinery to process ore from the giant Voisey's Bay deposit, but the province insists all processing must be done there.

"The smelter and refinery are non-negotiable," said Charles Furey, the Minister of Mines and Energy for the province. "They are not negotiable."

Mr. Furey said that from the first day of mining, all of the ore extracted at Voisey's Bay in Labrador must be processed at a smelter and refinery to be constructed by Inco at the former U.S. military base at Argentia. "The government has been consistent from day one."

Any talks between Toronto-based Inco, the world's largest nickel producer, and government officials are restricted to issues of power rates and taxation, he said. He disagreed with the suggestion by Inco that more far-reaching talks were under way on a confidential basis.

That appears to close the door on the possibility of maximizing production at Voisey's Bay, while scaling back or delaying the construction of a smelter and refinery at Argentia. Under that scenario, at least part of the ore from the rich ovoid deposit could be shipped to Sudbury, Ont., for processing at a profit. Inco says the earliest mining could begin is the year 2000.

Inco chairman Michael Sopko said that given the current, depressed state of the nickel mining industry and unresolved operational issues, the economics of the proposed smelter and refinery must be reassessed.

Mr. Sopko said there needs to be "creative thinking and flexibility" between Inco and the government so the needs of both are met, Mr. Sopko said.

But Newfoundland Premier Brian Tobin said construction of such a facility has always been a precondition before any ore will be allowed to be extracted from the Voisey's Bay nickel and copper deposit.

The government, with the assistance of experts who used Inco's own numbers, have indicated that the project is financially feasible, Mr. Furey said. "If that's not acceptable, they can pack their bags and leave."

Mr. Sopko said the problem facing Inco is what was feasible when nickel was trading at $3.50 a pound is not as attractive when nickel is trading at $2.40 a pound, as it has been recently. Any development must be based on sound economic principles, he said.

From Inco's point of view, taxes and power costs are just two of the unresolved variables. Ultimately, it must decide on the scale of the mine and mill project, which is expected to cost $350-million, and the construction timetable for the proposed $1-billion smelter and refinery complex to handle the maximum output at Voisey's Bay.

Inco officials are on record that they want to maximize production from the rich ovoid deposit at Voisey's Bay at an annual rate of 270 million pounds of nickel during first seven years or so.

But for Inco, the size of a smelter depends not only on ore that can be mined from the rich ovoid, but on the exploration and underground development work it needs to complete in order to evaluate the nickel resources within the Voisey's Bay property. That could take several years to assess.

But the government's negotiating stance would appear to rule out any possibility of designing a smelter to process only part of the ore from the ovoid and ship the balance elsewhere for processing. It also would also appear to preclude any chance of mining beginning at Voisey's Bay before the smelter is completed.

Mr. Furey said the current tumble in nickel prices can be expected given the cyclical nature of the mining business and should have no significant impact on Inco's plans for Voisey's Bay, which is based on long-term considerations.

"We are doing everything in our power to advance Voisey's Bay," Mr. Sopko said. But other outstanding issues remain, such as environmental approvals, land-claim settlements and impacts and benefit agreements with the province's Innu and Inuit.

Like other nickel producers, Inco has been hurt by the slump in metal prices. Yesterday, it reported a profit of $75-million or 25 cents a share for 1997, down from $179-million or $1.17 a year earlier.

Inco said the nickel industry is being hurt by the combination of higher Russian nickel exports and increased nickel-containing stainless steel scrap entering the market.

Although financial difficulties in Asia have yet to affect nickel sales, Mr. Sopko warned that the economic problems in those countries and its potential effects on the nickel business should not be underestimated.

Mr. Sopko said "the recent deterioration in nickel prices is unlikely to be reversed in the near term." Inco realized an average price of $3.36 a pound for the nickel it sold during 1997 under its long-term contracts, but its price will erode if nickel remains at $2.40 a pound.

"Inco is focused on becoming the most profitable and lowest-cost producer in the world," Mr. Sopko said. To that end, the company said its directors are scheduled to meet on Feb. 11 to consider other cost-saving measures. There has been reports that layoffs and additional mine closings are being considered. Employment costs represent about one-half of Inco's operating costs in Canada.



To: Cumbrian who wrote (158)2/5/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: Winer  Respond to of 1615
 
Maclean's Article

MACLEAN'S MAGAZINE
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
January 26, 1998 PAGE: 56
BYLINE : Peter C. Newman
COLUMN : The Nation's Business
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

CANADA CANNOT AVOID THE FALLOUT FROM ASIA: Successful stock promoter Robert Friedland says the Southeast Asian crisis will produce a `disaster for the Canadian worker'


The unabated free fall of Southeast Asia's major economies has created a tsunami of damaging economic tidings, about to wash up on our shores. We are no more safe from the consequences of the massacre from the region's once-powerful economic `Tigers,' than Eastern Canada has been immune from weather usually reserved for the impassable reaches of the furthest Arctic wastes.

`What we've got developing here,' I was told in an interview with billionaire Robert Friedland recently, while in Singapore just as the crisis was gathering speed, `is a disaster for the Canadian worker. They don't really understand what's coming at them. Nobody will be able to compete with Thailand or Taiwan, and particularly the South Koreans, who are going to be incredibly vicious exporters next year. Their only way out of the current crisis is to push their stuff out the door at any price - and they can produce almost everything cheaper than anybody else. Just think of the impact of $3,000 Hyundais hitting the Canadian car market. Already, Taiwan has shown an 80-per-cent increase in the export of electronics and computers to North America. There's a lot more to follow.'

Friedland, the Vancouver stock promoter who is responsible for bringing to market the $7-billion-plus nickel, copper and cobalt discovery at Voisey's Bay in northeastern Labrador, moved to Singapore shortly after making an estimated $500 million for his Labrador stake, which he sold to Inco. His current mining activities are spread throughout that part of Southeast Asia suffering its most acute financial crisis since the Second World War.

`We appear to be in a period of competitive devaluations of currencies amongst these Tiger economies,' he says. `They must export their way out of the trouble they're in. They have no other choice. Too long, their currencies have been tied to the American dollar, and the strength of that dollar has meant they were becoming less and less competitive. Also, too many people have built too much export capacity around the same things, making more electronic products and automobiles than can possibly be absorbed.

`Despite the present problems, the productive capacities of economies like South Korea, Taiwan and China are so fantastic, their labor rates so low, the manufacturing productivity so high, and the willingness of their workers to work hard for low wages so well-established that we're heading into a long period when everything produced in Asia will not be merely competitive, but radically - and I mean radically - cheaper than anywhere else. By the summer of this year, you're going to see every conceivable product landing in North America at impossibly low prices.'

Friedland admits that there continues to be a lag between the harsh reality of the situation and any understanding of what this phenomenon is going to mean, once its fallout hits Canada. What he fears most is that the impact of the massive influx of cheap foreign goods will revive the clamor, especially in the U.S. Senate, for the erection of protectionist barriers, which he describes as `the same paradigm that the world faced in 1929,' just prior to the Great Depression.

`The ultimate bogey man is no longer inflation,' he insists. `The real problem is how we prevent an integrated world economy, faced with the current Asian crisis, from triggering a round of other deflationary incidents. Once people understand that deflation is a much more scary phenomenon - because it means things are declining in value - you could have a reaction that would increase the value of hard assets, such as gold, copper and other metals.

`But for the time being, the world is clearly in a rush towards liquidity, and that means being measured against American dollars and U.S. Treasury bills. The value of everything on the planet is heading down against the American currency. That means not only the worth of the Asian economies is evaporating, but the value of the Canadian economy is dropping, the value of Australia is going down, and so on - all except England, where the pound sterling remains a strong, well-managed currency.'

Friedland's speculation about revived values for gold and copper may be wishful thinking. Shares in Indochina Goldfields, which specializes in gold and copper prospects, have lost more than 80 per cent in value over the past 12 months. His stake in Inco is similarly depressed, as that company struggles with sharply reduced nickel prices and the huge cost of bringing the Voisey's Bay deposit into production. (The value of Inco stock has dropped from a 1997 high of $19 to $2.50 at the end of trading last week.)

What Friedland envisages - and last week's continued hammering of Asian currencies and stock prices only makes his case stronger - is not merely a quantitative shift in the price levels of Asian exports to North America, but something much more serious. `The South Korean won and most other Asian currencies have lost more than half their value. As they keep dropping, these countries will not be able to afford North American goods, not our pulp or paper, wood or coal, so Canada will get dragged down in the process. I can see the Canadian dollar at 60 cents.'

Despite his short-term gloom, Friedland predicts some long-term benefits from the Asian debacle. `This crisis will trigger a number of gut-wrenching adjustments, but it will also sow the seeds of the region's economic rebirth,' he forecasts. `The Asian economies will eventually come back with an incredible vengeance, much more efficient and much less corrupt - leaner and meaner than ever.'



To: Cumbrian who wrote (158)2/5/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: Winer  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1615
 
Regional News: Voisey's Bay

Will smelter stand stall Voisey's Bay? 2/5/98
(By CHRIS FLANAGAN, Business Editor )


Inco is involved in intense negotiations with the province of Newfoundland over the future of the Voisey's Bay project, Inco Vicepresident David Allen said from Toronto Wednesday.

Allen, speaking on the day the world's largest nickel company announced it is losing money on its worldwide nickel operations and is looking to cut costs everywhere, said the price of electricity and the provincial tax regime are the major issues being discussed with Newfoundland.

"There is an internal review going on and there are intense negotiations with Newfoundland going on," Allen said, "on issues like power, taxes (and) a whole range of issues. They are some weeks away from being completed."

Newfoundland's minister of energy, Chuck Furey, and Premier Brian Tobin were not available for comment Wednesday and officials of both departments said they knew nothing about any high level talks.

Furey said several months ago that the Voisey's Bay Nickel Company must pay the full cost of developing a new source to generate the 180 megawatts it needs to operate a smelter and refinery at Argentia.

But everything has changed since then, Allen said.

"This morning the price of nickel is $2.40 US as opposed to $3.50 and $4 US when we were planning this initially," he said Wednesday. "It's sure making it look like a different kind of project in terms of the return we have to get investors and the expectations on the rate of return."

Toronto mining analysts say the news that Newfoundland would be charging full fare for power development may have surprised Inco.

"There was a bit of a shock to see the prospects for power costs - we're talking 37 mils, maybe more," said Research Capital Corp. president Manford Mallory. "On any kind of world competitive basis that's totally uncompetitive power costs."

Large industrial customers in Newfoundland pay between 35 and 40 mils (3.5 to 4 cents per kilowatt/hour), which is somewhere in the middle of the pack for industry in Canada.

But since a smelter requires so much power, mining companies usually search specifically for a site with cheap power and deep water, Mallory said.

Without political pressure from Newfoundland, Inco wouldn't even consider a smelter in the province, he said.

"We don't know when Voisey's Bay itself is going to be developed, but also if economic logic prevails, you would not build a smelter in Newfoundland," he said. "No harm intended, but the parameters that we are seeing from the smelter project would not justify the smelter project in itself."

Investors may have naively thought the project could benefit from cheap Labrador power, but that's not the case, Mallory said.

Tobin is involved in trying to start formal negotiations with HydroQuebec to harness the 3,100megawatt Lower Churchill hydroelectric project and build a transmission line to the island of Newfoundland.

But any development of the Lower Churchill would take a decade, and with a transmission line alone costing $2 billion, it won't necessarily be cheap.

"Ten years is a long time, that's a bit of a quandary," Mallory said.

Allen maintains Inco's original plan to produce 270 million pounds of nickel per year at an Argentia smelter is still on the books, but quickly adds the company is looking to cuts costs everywhere - including at the 70 person Voisey's Bay office in Newfoundland.

"The whole company's under scrutiny and there will be reductions in office operations in a number of places," Allen said. "I think you'll begin to see things within the next two weeks."

Inco laid off about 10 per cent of its workforce at Thompson, Man. and plans to reduce numbers at Sudbury, Ont. through retirement and attrition.

In its annual report on earnings issued Wednesday, Inco announced a profit of $75 million in 1997, down from $179 million in 1996. But analysts are more concerned with fourthquarter results, which show Inco lost $4 million, down from a $26million profit in 1996.

"Right now if you read the release we're not profitable," Allen said.