Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (12247)	10/26/2021 3:27:30 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26768

You are expanding the discussion beyond what was raised and we can't boil the ocean here. Your original point was that there already exists a wealth tax system, namely property taxes. That is astute observation. But my point to you was the city hall budgets and provides services that are more or less proportionate to their usage. Furthermore they don't tax you if you move out of the neighborhood. So the parallel is not good. If in fact you can provide a parallel similar system with the same attributes, then I would support it. As to the thought experiment that I suggested, you clearly did not do it. Maybe when I have more time I will expand on it. But for now, I think you will be surprised with what you will find out if you actually go through it.