Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ajtj's Post-Lobotomy Market Charts and Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ItsAllCyclical who wrote (44145)	11/19/2021 5:16:34 PM
From: Sun Tzu	2 Recommendations Recommended By ajtj99 ItsAllCyclical Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 96575

I disagree with Kyle Rittenhouse's politics, and based on what I have read, I would acquit him. I haven't dug deeply into the details, so I could be missing something. But from what I've read, there is no way I that can see him guilty of murder. And while we are at it, I would have prosecuted the police force that told him attaboy when they should have been doing the job he tried to do.

To: ItsAllCyclical who wrote (44145)	11/19/2021 6:26:43 PM
From: ajtj99	5 Recommendations Recommended By ItsAllCyclical Jacob Snyder Lou Weed roto sunabeach Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 96575

Let's also point out the obvious. If Kyle was a black teen toting an AR-15 and shot a bunch of white folks in the exact same manner and was defended by a public defender, I suspect the outcome would have been far different. It helps to have perspective. I think Kyle's legal fund was bulging at the seams. If he had a public defender, his outcome probably would have been different. Money can buy better verdicts. Matt is a great reporter. He should have a Pulitzer by now.

To: ItsAllCyclical who wrote (44145)	11/20/2021 7:22:30 PM
From: roto	2 Recommendations Recommended By Cogito Ergo Sum ItsAllCyclical Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 96575

everybody is looking at the event going backwards.. Rittenhouse, a minor at the time, left his home armed, crossed a state line, and discharged his firearm. He owns 50% of this event equation no matter what the courts or publics thinks. One of two things, probably both, he's highly impressionistic or one very stupid asshole (stupidity isn't curable). I place much problem on a 2008 Supreme court.. especially Anthony Scalia, the "conservative" court in liberalizing the intent of the 2nd amendment, with the Supreme Court's 1st conclusive interpretation of the 2nd Amendment since it's ratification in 1791. The purity of Scalia's (questionable) writings (thinking) ensured the availability of firearms in the protection of one's home, but furthermore, as stated, should not cast doubt on the prohibition of firearms by felons, "retards", or areas of sensitivity. npr.org The floodgate opened.. think of it this way, go visit a firearms store and take note of the armament available for sale. There's money/ politics in people's emotions & ultimately in others misery if things don't jive. The washout be damned. of note: I do not have any problems whatsoever of firearms in one's home.. but on exit, the ballpark complicates.