Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (180985)	12/6/2021 6:28:51 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218740

Re <<Eth ... CSPR>> (1) Blood-shower was refreshing Message 33607317 (2) Given that CSPR can do everything ETH 1.0 can do is a feature, because CSPR, borne of ETH 1.0, skipped the so far mythical ETH 2.0 given migration hiccups, delays, issues, whatever, skipped ahead to ETH 3.0. I keep in mind a central truth not recognised by the market, that, CSPR = ETH 3.0, and that ETH 1.0 => ETH 2.0 is a perhaps, maybe, and might just blackhole at para-verse speed (3) I appreciate Powell's 'inflation is not-transitory' remark, because an interest rate rise cannot fix inflation compelled by trade war, logistic jam, and distilled fear about governance of all rules (4) Gold does not seem to be a hedge against inflation, transitory and persistent, yet (5) CSPR seems a good hedge against inflation, normal planned, extraordinary hyper, as well as deflation, technologically impelled and direly diaper. For whatever the pricing, CSPR yields 8-10% APY! I like the para-verse APY %, that which is essentially constant, compared to normal-verse APY %, that which declines as the underlying asset appreciates.