Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Rieman who wrote (29199)	2/6/1998 5:04:00 PM
From: Stoctrash	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50808

John, Do you know in what timeframe they must report? In other words, once they reach 5% or greater, how long do they have to report it to the SEC? 30 days? Edgar here I come...

To: John Rieman who wrote (29199)	2/6/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: John Arnopp	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50808

Whoa! guys...I've been following this 13-G discussion, and I'm sure American Century crossed the 5% mark, but it was down, not up: Item 5. OWNERSHIP OF FIVE PERCENT OR LESS OF A CLASS If this statement is being filed to report the fact that as of the date hereof the reporting person has ceased to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the class of securities, check the following [X]. And there are no listings of the amounts owned, percentages, etc. They don't apply. I'm bullish on CUBE, but let's keep the facts straight.

To: John Rieman who wrote (29199)	2/10/1998 1:14:00 AM
From: Humblefrank	Respond to of 50808

Did anyone respond to your post the other week showing percentage of ownership? It seems like Valentine and many of the prior managers such as Burke had less holdings? I know Valentine is also part of Sequoia, but I thought he owned a million shares individually. Whatever happened to Kubata and such? I remember Bob Gintel being bothered by the high number of insider ownership. Perhaps this has been a big cause of the last year's down moves. The good thing is perhaps there is less insider interest now. I wonder if any of the insiders were actually short the stock to protect what they had. Is that legal and how would we know about it?