SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (220987)12/26/2021 1:00:56 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 362593
 
"Corruption has been blatantly proved"

That's a lie, of course.



To: i-node who wrote (220987)12/26/2021 1:20:48 PM
From: Lane32 Recommendations

Recommended By
CentralParkRanger
combjelly

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 362593
 
And none was able to prove fraud. What do you think that is? Because there was no fraud? Of course not.

Have you ever heard of a fraud case being developed over the course of two months?

Of course you can't prove it to the point of a conviction. But you're expected to have probably cause when you show up before a judge, to show seriousness and promise. First of all, the lawyers didn't present to the courts anything substantive, anything reasonably pursuable. Like you, they conflated evidence and suspicions. And second, they were lousy lawyers presumably because the sharp lawyers knew the charges were crap and wouldn't debase themselves to present them so there was no one left to hire.

If a far left billionaire can walk in and spend 500 Billion to buy selected votes in selected counties -- and that is acceptable to you, you have not a shred of integrity left on which to even build.

That would not have been acceptable to me had it happened. As I said earlier today, just because you suspect something doesn't mean it happened. If you can't differentiate between a suspicion and an occurrence, there's no hope for you recognizing reality.