SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ibexx who wrote (5035)2/6/1998 8:20:00 PM
From: Alan Buckley  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Interesting article. It seems MSFT does a big re-org every time a significant product ships, in this case IE4. I like that, believing it's an anti-bureaucracy technique that helps prevent little fiefdoms from forming within the company. In this case I would guess Silverberg's absence has a lot more to do with it than DOJ posturing.

This news about working with Nokia to get little WinCE devices manufactured is interesting also. A few years ago the joke was that MSFTs strategy was "Windows in toasters". We may actually see that in the next few years.



To: Ibexx who wrote (5035)2/7/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: X-Ray Man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Except it's utter bullshit. Otherwise IE couldn't be developed
for other platforms. MSFT is playing a game of chicken with DOJ.
This should worry MSFT investors. It doesn't matter who you feel
is right. Reality is that it will cost MSFT if it decides to
play hardball with DOJ. If MSFT simply played the game, they
would continue to make the $$$ anyway. Mark my words, or well
bookmark them then, DOJ will redouble their efforts as a result
and the courts will be more sympathetic, because the argument
that time is running out to restrain MSFT will have more potency.
This will mean greater likelihood of injunctions granted to DOJ.
This is not in MSFT shareholder's interest, since a potential
injunction against Win98 could result, and would likely have direct
impact on share price. Or breakup of the company. I think MSFT
took this move because they know DOJ is about to bring case to
court against MSFT on advantages MSFT may have had regarding API
over external developers. By folding IE group into OS group,
they hope to claim now that no such situation could exist regarding
browser developers, because they have now separate browser group,
and anyway, it is impossible to separate groups now without hurting
development of OS. That is, similar argument to what they are
saying about code for IE and OS. But this will likely backfire,
IMO. The danger with being too aggressive is that eventually your
enemies may become numerous enough to do you some damage.