Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: flickerful who wrote (5039)	2/6/1998 10:07:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20981

And how would it be done? I assume Bill's bathroom gives off his office, not Betty's. So waht did she do? Sense that hanky panky was about to take place, sashay in and say, ooops, 'scuse me I think I'll go hide in the john? And as I observed earlier, I would NEVER use an employer's private bath if there were any chance he might wish to do so, to my surprise and embarrassment. And Betty really doesn't seem to be an idiot.

To: flickerful who wrote (5039)	2/6/1998 10:52:00 PM
From: Grainne	Respond to of 20981

Someone who was transparently truthful would say that she had hidden in the bathroom to avoid an embarrassing situation, if indeed that was the truth, and she was asked under oath. I am not saying that this is the truth. These are all ALLEGATIONS. But I think that what MAY be shameful about Betty Currie is not the POSSIBILITY that she gave Starr truthful information about the president that was less than flattering or helpful to Clinton, but that a man in a position of power would hide behind his secretary for protection, or put her in potentially incriminating situations involving his extramarital sexual behavior. The workplace really should be free of this kind of ALLEGEDLY amoral vibration, so that a professional secretary can do her work without feeling POTENTIALLY anguished.