Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Real Man who wrote (66493)	1/10/2022 8:27:51 PM
From: ggersh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71412

Actually it never should've gotten to the Supreme Court, any lower court should've known mandates are unconstitutional. According to Dubya, the Constitution is nothing but a piece of paper. Since his presidency and the Patriot Act the constitution is no longer being used as law. Remember under Dubya torture became legal, under Obama droning american citizens became legal There is nothing fascist about US constitution. If, in fact, such mandates are unconstitutional, the Supreme Court has the power and the legal duty to block them. USA PATRIOT Act \| FinCEN.gov https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/usa-patriot-act The purpose of the USA PATRIOT Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and other purposes, some of which include: To strengthen U.S. measures to prevent, detect and prosecute international money laundering and financing of terrorism;