Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (5092)	2/7/1998 2:26:00 AM
From: WalleyB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

So lisa, what did I miss by not waiting for the rest of your profile to load? Looks like Starr is of the belief that the White House has just as much motive to leak details that they are aware of so that they can control the spin and the damage of that info. see second to last paragraph. Now that is enlighting. After all, you heard it here at SI first! <g> Sure you don't want to reveal your vocation? some of us won't be able to sleep tonight if you don't! jh

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (5092)	2/7/1998 2:47:00 AM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

lisa, I don't see how you could infer that I am "vilifying" Betty Currie "because she is a secretary," nor am I "upholding her" to anything! Lisa, now that IS a slick sleight of hand, rabbit-out-of-a-hat "interpretation" of my posts. Heavens, but I would never vilify a secretary, having myself been intermittently employed in that time-honored and noble profession. I did post that secretary by definition is a keeper of secrets, and I personally subscribe to that premise and that exacting standard of professionalism. Were I to find myself in the employ of someone to whom I could not afford this expected degree of allegiance, I would seek employment elsewhere. However, short of breaking a definable law, the "secrets" learned during that period of employment would remain safe with me. BTW, I am probably blessed with the slowest modem on this thread. Thus, pulling up the Drudge Report can be a religious experience. Therefore, I did not read what you referred to in your post to me and, obviously, cannot comment. I did go back and read the ten or so posts posted while I was posting this. Yes, the word "material" as in material facts, or facts of a material nature, is very important to keep in mind throughout all of this. So far, I've not heard or read anything I would consider to be facts of a "material" nature in this context. Holly