Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (5130)	2/7/1998 1:26:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

The Paula Jones lawsuit is a judicial matter outside the realm of governmental business. He has a duty to answer the questions put to him truthfully, just as any citizen should. I agree that he has an obligation to answer questions about Jones. I do not think he should be required to respond to anything her attorney's might want to know about his sexual activity with other women. My guess is that if he'd simply refused to do so, nobody'd have thrown him in jail for contempt of court; on the contrary, he's probably have been applauded.