Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (225220)	2/7/2022 12:43:55 PM
From: Lane3	6 Recommendations Recommended By bentway Cautious_Optimist CentralParkRanger combjelly Sam and 1 more member Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359689

Do your "critical thinking skills" not indicate something is amiss when a committee comprised of 100% bitter partisans have been appointed by the most bitter partisan of all -- Pelosi, who launched three separate impeachment efforts against Trump while he was in office My observation skills tell me that the committee composition, its existence, even, was in large part a function of Republican refusal to participate in an earnest non-partisan inquiry. Some "amiss" was interjected there. Also "amiss" is your framing the committee as "100% bitter partisans." That's both category error and bias. Regardless of the composition of the committee, evidence is evidence. The risk the committee composition potentially poses to a correct outcome is not that they will fake evidence but that they might omit, intentionally or otherwise, what doesn't fit their narrative. The risk of an incomplete report is compounded Republicans who deliberately choose not to present their evidence. So, to answer your question, one should be alert to the potential for an incomplete presentation whether due to bias on the part of the participants or to the absence of certain other participants.