Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (225224)	2/7/2022 1:00:31 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 359793

>> My observation skills tell me that the committee composition, its existence, even, was in large part a function of Republican refusal to participate in an earnest non-partisan inquiry. Some "amiss" was interjected there. That's a cop-out, any way you look at it. You always want, on any committee I know of, more views, disparate in nature, not fewer. If the objective were to find the truth. So, you'd rather have a couple of extreme trump-haters than to have serious questioning by people who are particularly excellent at asking hard questions? Is that how you'd run a serious inquiry? How is that a pursuit of truth? It isn't. It is a quest for unanimity where the majority outcome is predetermined. So, you're talking about unanimity in Trump Hate. Which is consistent with Pelosi's actions for four straight years, including no fewer than three impeachment attempts. So, your claim above notwithstanding, is bunk.