SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andreas Helke who wrote (13816)2/8/1998 3:50:00 PM
From: AreWeThereYet  Respond to of 45548
 
Andrea, you weren't wrong, 33k is indeed the maximum limit of a "typical" copper media. 56k is an asymmetric solution which take the advantage of the "one-way" digital connection.

aC



To: Andreas Helke who wrote (13816)2/9/1998 10:41:00 PM
From: Crzy Joe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
<<< The difference is this time the limit is really reached. In the telephone network the line is digitally encoded with 64 kbit/s. With a clever trick it was possible to make most of this speed available. But you can not squeeze more into the line than the 64 kbit/s that the backbone network is allocating to a single POTS line.
I had expected that we had reached the speed limit with 33 kbit/s and was proven wrong one more time. >>>

Andreas,

You will be proven wrong one more time, if you don't factor in ADSL type of modems etc...

But then again. 56 (53k) would probably be the fastest you get, while paying only the regular phone bill. With ADSL, it's the same old telephone lines. You get faster speeds, but at a significantly higher cost. The faster you want it, the more it costs.