Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (13085)	2/14/2022 2:38:31 PM
From: PJr	1 Recommendation Recommended By Investor2 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26782

It won't be any easier to outvote algorithms in 2022 and 2024 than it was in 2020 in toss-up states. I'm not saying they did, but if the far left actually did pull shenanigans in 2020, the perpetrators know with certainty that they got away with it without consequence. They also know that barring unforeseen events the odds are really stacked against them in 2022. Again, if they truly know that they pulled shenanigans, they will be so emboldened by their success in 2020, they'll believe there are no limits to the shenanigans that they can pull without consequence in future elections. When that happens enough times, accusations become easier to deflect no matter how egregious the charges. "Oh, those pesky right wingers. They ALWAYS scream fraud when they lose." That becomes easy to believe if it happens in two or three consecutive elections. The states better have foolproof checks and balances firmly in place in 2022. The country can't afford to have election skepticism twice in a row. Confidence in fair elections is nearly impossible to regain once trust is lost. "Hello, Third World" if that comes to pass. PJr