SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Senior who wrote (69862)3/2/2022 12:24:24 PM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78817
 
Just on the face of what's presented, most stocks are going to be immediately rejected by readers -- no interest in the business or sector, not priced low enough, too many business issues, no history, etc. No further discussion necessary. There's not much wasted time in pondering these decisions.

In order for this "reader rejection" to occur, the person who brings up the stock should discuss the business or sector, the price valuation, the business issues, the history, etc. Right? That's my point.

Bring up a stock with zero information about the business / sector / relative valuation.......and especially without mentioning what the company does, is a complete waste of time. Right?

Lots of ideas is fine, but there's gotta be some meat in the idea.



To: Paul Senior who wrote (69862)3/2/2022 9:20:49 PM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78817
 
I personally prefer if a poster puts out some rationale for the buy or even better pros and cons. I am guessing some are just to lazy to do so, or are afraid their thesis gets shredded. Both are OK, but of course some detail on a stock or source material makes it easier for the reader to draw his own conclusions or get a discussion of the merits going.