Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: didjuneau who wrote (759085)	3/10/2022 3:34:34 PM
From: DMaA	1 Recommendation Recommended By THE WATSONYOUTH Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793670

The whole subject of intellectual property is in turmoil. I know of a company who got a patent a couple of years ago for something I worked on 40 years ago. It's a total joke.

To: didjuneau who wrote (759085)	3/11/2022 6:56:37 PM
From: didjuneau	1 Recommendation Recommended By pheilman_ Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793670

Glen Greenwald explains: There's no difference between bio-research and bio-weapons development as far as the lab is concerned. The "out" is the motive. They are allowed to excuse dangerous pathogen development if they call it "threat defense" according to the international biological weapons treaty. This is a long discussion with the 2001 anthrax attack on the US as an example. It was used as an "unintentional"(????) false flag to get us into the Iraq war. Conveniently, after the fact of the entry into the war, it was determined that it was a Fort Detrick army researcher who had done it and erased himself from any further questioning and prosecution. But the FBI was certain it was him.... citizenfreepress.com So of course, it wasn't the US that broke the treaty in this case. It was a rogue researcher acting on his own. Sorry, Iraq. The fake news media made us do it. Actually, I am sorry, if any Iraqis are reading this. We have a lot to fix here at home.