Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (5480)	2/9/1998 9:27:00 AM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Respond to of 20981

dk link at end of post... exchange2000.com as someone pointed out...the last sentence of the points is telling...

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (5480)	2/9/1998 10:39:00 AM
From: Grainne	Respond to of 20981

Hi, Dwight! I see someone else provided the link to the talking points for you already. One of the most important things Starr is trying to find out is their origin, because that is where the obstruction of justice charges would come into play. Obviously, Monica Lewinsky knows where they originated, and I read somewhere that it is thought they were word-processed on her computer. I basically agree with your analysis, Dwight. It is still hard for me to believe the worst stories about the president, but unfortunately not as hard as it was before. I do think that the scandal is widening, and that Starr's office has a stronger case than is publicly known. With the purported testimony before the Grand Jury of this Raines woman, the network news programs are referring to this as the third friend of Moncia Lewinsky's who has confirmed she told them she was having a sexual relationship with the president. I guess the other two would be Linda Tripp and her old, married drama teacher. This kind of evidence--reports to friends and associates at the time an event happened--is generally held to be fairly reliable, and I wish I could remember the proper legal descriptive phrase for this kind of evidence. Could an attorney here refresh my memory?

To: Dwight E. Karlsen who wrote (5480)	2/9/1998 11:30:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20981

But evidently if that was the case, then Clinton didn't realize that widows don't immediately start french-kissing people (or whatever they did) before their husbands have been laid into the grave --at least not in polite society. You'd be surprised what normally cautious and respectable people can get up to under the influence of shock and stress. Another possibility that could be thrown out for the sake of argument: whether before or after her husband's death, Willey had reason to be very angry with him. He'd been caught embezzling, they owed tons of money, she would have to support the family, the whole nine yards. She cannot have been very happy with the situation, and it's far from impossible to imagine she felt no loyalty toward him. You make an interesting point about the security clearance. But--you'd have to go back several thousand posts to find one by Jack Clarke on the subject of borderline personality disorder--compulsive liars and fantasists can be weirdly convincing. Probably because they actually believe everything they say.