Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : World Outlook -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Green who wrote (30123)	4/14/2022 7:09:55 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 49101

They posted a video but you can't see anything and it contradicts the claim that 2 missiles hit the vessel. I tend to think it was an anti-ship missile or a mine. A lot made the damage was higher up in the ship but that may have been secondary damage and there were rough seas, Since they've created a significant land bridge between Crimea and Russia, it's less important. smallwarsjournal.com

To: Don Green who wrote (30123)	4/14/2022 8:34:07 PM
From: John Koligman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 49101

CNN is showing a breaking news banner that states 'sources believe the Ukrainian version of events is credible'. Now who the 'source' is, I don't know. This is apparently the very same ship that the Ukrainians on that island told to 'go f#ck yourself'. Icing on the cake would have been the Ukrainians adding an admiral to their list of high level Russian military 'eliminated'. General Hertling on CNN also mentioned that the Ukrainians put out info on the strike a couple of hours before the Russians mentioned anything about a 'fire'. Edit - I also noticed some reports on Russian ships now heading 'further away from the Ukrainian coast'. Just in case, right?