Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (761450)	4/16/2022 4:45:01 PM
From: Maple MAGA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793707

If they have the ability to detect a phone they also have the ability to inject a phone that isn't really there.

To: Sdgla who wrote (761450)	4/16/2022 6:13:23 PM
From: didjuneau	2 Recommendations Recommended By pak73 SirWalterRalegh Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793707

Since Durham (filing 61) used the word Conspiracy or Conspirator 25 times, it is beyond question to my mind that he's considering the frame job for Spygate to be a conspiracy. That means the statute of limitations that the rats thought they could escape with is no longer in effect. They have to "withdraw" from the conspiracy first before the statute of limitations even starts. Message 33731594 What's more, is that in a RICO conspiracy, an overt act is not required to be a part of the conspiracy. Just knowing about what's behind the curtain could get a lot of people in trouble. Looks like Researcher 2 (Dagon) has withdrawn. "First responders" may get immunity. The clock is ticking on that offer - the more the Special Counsel investigators discover, the less likely they'll be to offer a get out of jail free card to the tech slaves. Message 33732050