Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (186530)	4/17/2022 7:24:34 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217792

Without taking sides, would say until and unless all combatants and near-combatants fess-up to what the war is actually about, the war shall not end except in tragedy of one or the other side losing big and civilians losing all, and that, perhaps, might be the point, teeing up yet another war to end all wars. Haim is correct that unless Russia stopped this sort of war shall go on and enlarge to engulf You are not wrong that if you are Russian you would fight, else all ends quickly against you and your civilians C2 is spot-on that the war on the face of it is not existential for USA, tactically Sense might be (implicitly if my understanding is correct of his explicit take) right that should USA fall down on its explicit obligations undertaken, ala Afghanistan / Kurds etc etc … then it is all over The core problem with the 1st world domains might be that they collectively industrialized the killing of people, and people are, by definition, mostly civilians.