Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (186980)	4/25/2022 8:12:09 PM
From: TobagoJack	1 Recommendation Recommended By Secret_Agent_Man Respond to of 217705

Observations (1) Make friends when can, and not once have to (1-i) Fareed is wrong, in that it not is in Saudi interest to see oil price down out to see the flame go out once atomic, solar, and wind and and and fully rolled out (1-ii) Fareed is also wrong, in that energy needs of EU shall absolutely pulverise any fiction of EU / Nato unity for a fight that in truth is not the fight of the electorates, and we are months away from the day cold showers become not an option (1-iii) Lt Gen Mark is wrong, because Team Russia shall target industrial infrastructure of the Ukraines next, such that counter-artillery fire is silenced and tanks do not roll (1-iv) Bottom line, with oil prices high, and Fareed is correct, and revenue flowing, time is on Team Russia's side (1-v) Unclear to me what advantage there be to Team USA to maintain the fight without fighting, because Fareed is wrong, nations all around the planet is doubting more than ever, historically speaking, about the veracity and the efficacy of Team USA security guarantee. Without boots on the ground, the guarantee is not really operational except for being a trap with rug-pull underlying the construct, and (1-vi) Should Team USA actually put boots on the ground, would fall into same trap as Russia and Ukraine, to be rug-pulled by Germany and France. (1-vii) I do not see a win for anyone engaged in the trap. (2) Noam might be correct that (2-i) USA today is not USA 1950s (2-ii) Nato is done, peaked (2-iii) If not, done, by destruction (2-iii) If not, planet done done (3) Ukraine got rug-pulled, and USA cannot do much, unless call and raise, in which case events turn interesting

To: maceng2 who wrote (186980)	4/25/2022 8:27:09 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217705

speaking of Ukraine industrial infrastructure 'it', the attack, starts soon enough, diesel logistics, electricity grid, cellular communications, etc etc unclear how starlink might fuel mobile artillery and words substitute for munitions Team USA best make landing if intending to boots-on-the-ground, else stop the rug-pull and let the Ukrainians decide how they make do on own Nato is not coming to genuine aid, and Poland might well be engulfed if careless The Pentagon, having lost Afghanistan so very recently, best prepare to lose Ukraine unless unleashed by the Capitol Hill politicians and State Dept functionaries, but let us not reckon in 'home by Christmas' for war does not run by calendar dates and is a contest of will backed by unity zerohedge.com Russia Ramps Up Attacks On Ukraine Rail Lines To Thwart NATO Arms Shipments The Russian military is ramping up efforts to thwart Western arms deliveries into Ukraine, on Monday striking at least six railway stations and facilities. In a statement late in the day the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) confirmed it attacked the locations, including taking out train tracks and transport lines, as they were being used "to supply Ukrainian forces with foreign weapons,"according to state RIA. Earlier in the day Ukrainian Railways authority head Oleksander Kamyshin had confirmed that five of the stations were hit, saying there were at this point uknown numbers of casualties, during what was described as an "unusually long" continuous air raid that lasted a reported two hours Monday morning. File image: Ukrainian military transport train, via MilitaryImages.net Ukraine's military command saw it as part of ongoing Russian efforts to completely disable the country's military transport infrastructure, specifically with an eye on foreign arms transfers as what the Kremlin previously dubbed "legitimate targets". Kiev and the UN have also condemned attacks on civilians and vital civilian transport at a time of unprecedented numbers of internally displaced war refugees. According to The Guardian: Kamyshin said one of the attacks took place at about 8.30am in Krasne, near Lviv in western Ukraine, at what the governor of the region described as a “traction substation” that handled power supply to other lines. He said emergency workers were at the scene. Maksym Kozytskyi, the head of the regional government in Lviv, said that during the attack Ukrainian anti-aircraft systems destroyed another missile fired at the region. A follow-up Ukrainian military statement posted to social media alerted the public that the Russians "are trying to destroy the supply routes of military-technical assistance from partner states. To do this, they focus strikes on railway junctions." There were prior attacks on train stations by Russia during the opening days of this month, but also against other infrastructure seen as having a dual civilian and military use, including power plants and oil refineries. Very likely these efforts to disrupt and destroy arms shipments will only ramp up, potentially brining Russia and NATO into more direct confrontation. On Monday the hugely provocative words of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin are being widely reported wherein he said just after his trip to Kiev where alongside Secretary Blinken he met President Zelensky face-to-face that Washington has an aim to weaken Russia. Unverified social media photograph showing train station near Lviv after attack. "We want to see Russia weakened to the degree that it can’t do the kinds of things that it has done in invading Ukraine," the Pentagon chief said. "It has already lost a lot of military capability, and a lot of its troops quite frankly" - he added, speaking of the Russian military.